Answer:
a. certain types of cancers take twenty to thirty years to develop, and cell phone studies have only been monitoring this potential connection for ten years or less.
Explanation:
<u>This statement explains how we can't for the sure claim there are more benefits off the cell phone because the studies of the health effects have not been going on for long enough for us to prove that.</u>
<u>The damage is yet to be revealed, as stated in the claim, but it can be of great influence if proven that cell phones are connected to the development of cancer.</u>
<u>The B statement</u> does not add anything to the first claim and does not contradict it, as it just gives information about phone history usage and not the health benefits or risks.
<u>The C statement </u>is not counterclaiming as it adds up to the mentioned benefits - it explains how cell phones are helping life in general and do not refer to the statement about health risks.
<u>The D statement </u>mentions claims by agencies that are not health-based, and also supports the first statement, saying how there are no links to cancer development so far. It actually only goes with the original statement, and the A statement is counterclaim for it as well.
One way that scientist hope to use the recent knowledge gained about non coding RNAs lies with the possibilities for their use in medicine. I would expect to gain most from RNAs which is one of the scenarios for future research will be targeting siRNAs to disable the expression of an allele associated with autosomal dominant disease.
I believe the answer is: Cognitive
The cognitive approach of psychology focuses on how the thought that people have would affect their overall behaviour. The thought process would influence whether people see their problems in positive or negative lights. People who see them in negative perspective, tend to adopt a defeatist behaviour and tend to choose to run away from their problems rather than facing it.
It’s not A , it’s not D, I am pretty sure that it’s B.
I hope this helps!