Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
It is the indicator of human health which is a Sustainable Development Goal of a UN.
If health is good other indicators of progress will improve with it. Like if there is improvement in child care, there will less morbidity and mortality rate which result in less consumption on child health in total.
Healthy child can compete brilliantly and excels in education which is enlisted as an other UN SDGs.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:History continues to prove the wisdom of the Founders' belief in the unity of both political and economic freedom. ... Then, as now, some have wanted government to impose regulations, tariffs, taxes, or other interventions to protect and advantage certain activities and to minimize economic risk.
Explanation:
Freedom itself was important to our country's Founders. Our right to be free was built into the Constitution, especially in the Bill of Rights, which prevented Congress from passing laws that infringe upon our freedoms. ... Because our natural rights come from God, and not from other people, or the government.
Hope it helps!!
Answer: by using local property taxes to fund public schools, trapping poor children in poor schools
Explanation: Jonathan Kozol is an American writer, educator, and activist best known for his publications on public education in the United States. In savage inequalities, Kozol pointed out how students from poor family background are trapped in poorly funded schools since public school funding comes from local property taxes which vary widely between communities.
The basis of Kozol's argument is the comparisons between rich and poor school districts, in particular the amount of money spent per child. School districts with relatively wealthy property-owners are spending over $20,000 per year per child while school districts where poor people live spend about $11,000 per year per child.
The pertinent question he asks is whether it is fair or right that the place of one's birth or residence should determine the quality of education a child is entitled to.
D. Air pollution is not as much of a problem there
