All categories

3 years ago

G(x)= 3x − 3; Find g(−6)

Mathematics

2 answers:

MAXImum [283]3 years ago

6 0

G(−6) = 3(-6) − 3 = -18 - 3 = -21

answer
g(−6) = -21

Irina18 [472]3 years ago

4 0

g(x)= 3x − 3
g(−6)

g(-6) = 3(-6) - 3
g(-6) = -18 - 3
g(-6) = -21

The answer is -21.

You might be interested in

High School Mathematics 5+3 pts

quester [9]

What is the question?

6 0

3 years ago

Among the four northwestern states, Washington has 51% of the total population, Oregon has 30%, Idaho has 11%, and Montana has 8

morpeh [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

H₀ : The distribution of the sample agrees with the population distribution.

H₁ : the distribution of the does not agree with the population distribution.

Using the Chi-square test statistics

we will compute the expected frequencies

Now expected frequency for Washington will be

Fe = Npi = 1000×51% = 5100

expected frequency for Oregon

Fe = Npi = 1000×30% = 300

expected frequency for Idaho

Fe = Npi = 1000×11% = 110

expected frequency for Montana

Fe = Npi = 1000×8% = 80

The Chi=square test statistics is;

x² = ∑ [ (Fo - Fe)² / Fe )

now we substitute

Given our Fo ( 450 in Washington, 340 in Oregon, 150 in Idaho, and 60 in Montana) from the question

x² = (450-510)²/510 + (340-300)²/300 + (150-110)²/110 + (60-80)²/80

x²= 31.9376

so the chi-square test statistics is 31.9376

Now the chi-square critical value

first we compute for degree of freedom

d.f = k -1 = 4 - 1 = 3

So from the critical value table, degree of freedom 3 and significance level 0.05,

the chi-square critical value is 7.8147

Therefore chi-square test statistics 31.9376 is greater than the chi-square critical value 7.8147, so NULL HYPOTHESIS IS REJECTED at 5% significance.

There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that the distribution of the sample agrees with the distribution of the state populations.

3 0

3 years ago

What is the solution for I

xeze [42]

Answer:

no solution

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

I have $3,800 in two accounts for one year. The first account earns a yearly interest of 3.5%. The second account earns a yearly

loris [4]

Answer:

-$1000

Step-by-step explanation:

(3800 - x)*3.5/100 = (3800 + x)*6/100

(3800 - x)7/200 = 3/50(3800 + x)

3800 - x = 12/7(3800 + x)

3800 - x = 45600/7 + 12x/7

(19x + 19000)/7 = 0

19x = -19000

x = -$1000.

The minus implies that the investment must occur in the first account, not the second. It wouldn't make sense to add more money into the second account, because the second account already exceeds the $188 interest with the amount it has in there. Therefore $1000 must be added from the second account and invested into the first.

3 0

3 years ago

The histogram below shows the distribution of the assets (in millions of dollars) of 71 companies. Does the distribution appear

solniwko [45]

Answer:

Yes, the assets appear to follow a normal distribution, the values are concentrated in the center and taper off towards the ends

Step-by-step explanation:

The distribution shown above is normal as it exhibits symmetry. This means thatvtge values are concentrated in the middle with the peak so situated in the middle of the distribution which is exactly what is displayed above. As we move towards either side of the center, the values begin to decrease and we have the tail at either side of the midpoint and not on one side of the distribution.

7 0

3 years ago