1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
harina [27]
2 years ago
10

In your opinion is the Miranda warning good or bad? Why?

History
1 answer:
r-ruslan [8.4K]2 years ago
5 0

I think that the Miranda warning is good because the problem was trying to determine what counted as a coerced confession. Well into the 20th century, police officers would beat suspects, or keep defendants in isolation for days, to get a confession. The methods of police interrogation were so diverse, and the effects of isolation, intimidation and defendant ignorance so varied, that appellate courts found it difficult to determine afterward whether a confession had been truly voluntary.

You might be interested in
3. El huso mitotico se rompe y reaparece el nucleolo y la membrana nuclear. *
Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Who were the Muckrakers?
mixas84 [53]

The correct answer to this question is: 1 writers who worked to reform aspects of society

Muckrackers were socially conscious journalists who worked to expose the worst aspects of society.

5 0
3 years ago
How is the Electoral College a form of indirect democracy?
Snezhnost [94]
The electoral college was formed for the people to vote, so I would say that it is a form of indirect democracy, because the people make the decision by voting but they do not make their decision directly.
8 0
2 years ago
French soldiers brought home American ideas about government and rights, including news of the Declaration of Independence. One
Paraphin [41]
Rousseau is your answer :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the relationship between the Great Acceleration and the high likelihood that human existence could be detected 100 milli
lana [24]

Answer:  first of all, the world NEVER existed for 100 millions years, billions, it never did. You might be shocked but the world exists only for 6,000 and a half years. If the world existed for millions of years than we would only see technology everywhere and we would have a terrible climate change, air pollution, we would have dust everywhere, tsunami's, earthquakes etc. I'm getting this according to the bible  

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone please help
    12·1 answer
  • see what is got by those extravagant and presumptuous speculations which have taught your leaders to despise all their predecess
    15·1 answer
  • to which brand of government does the power to interpret laws and apply the Constitution to the law belong?
    13·2 answers
  • Tartuffe's appearance in Act 3 is known as which of the following?
    12·2 answers
  • HELP PLS! RELIGION QUESTION
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following leaders would be considered the most anti-revolutionary? (5 points)
    7·2 answers
  • Members of Congress agreed to the Missouri Compromise in an attempt to prevent serious conflict. Write a letter to a member of C
    11·1 answer
  • During the 1920 presidential election, Warren Harding made the idea of the "return to normalcy" central to his campaign. This id
    15·2 answers
  • Explain the geographical context that led to the development of the Ancient Greece civilization.
    7·1 answer
  • Memorial day first commemorated soldiers killed in which war?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!