1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
3 years ago
7

Tim is investigating the relationship between the number of years since a tree was planted and the height of the tree in feet. H

is data are shown in the table.
Years Since Tree was Planted vs. Height of Tree
Years since tree was planted, x
Height of tree in feet, y
2
17
3
25
5
42
6
47
7
54
9
69

Using a regression calculator, what is a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old?

A calculator screen. A 2-column table with 6 rows titled Data. Column 1 is labeled x with entries 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 17, 25, 42, 47, 54, 69. The regression equation is y almost-equals 7.36 x + 3.08; r almost-equals 0.998.
A good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old is about 315 feet because that is what the trend line, y almost-equals 3.08 x + 7.36, produced by the regression calculator predicts.
A good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old is about 739 feet because that is what the trend line, y almost-equals 7.36 x + 3.08, produced by the regression calculator predicts.
There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the trend line produced by the regression calculator does not give a prediction.
There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.
Mathematics
1 answer:
wolverine [178]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.

Step-by-step explanation:

Years since tree was planted (x) - - - - height (y)

2 - - - - 17

3 - - - - 25

5 - - - 42

6 - - - - 47

7 - - - 54

9 - - - 69

Using a regression calculator :

The height of tree can be modeled by the equation : ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08

With y being the predicted variable; 7.36 being the slope and 3.08 as the intercept.

X is the independent variable which is used in calculating the value of y.

Predicted height when years since tree was planted(x) = 100

ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08

ŷ = 7.36(100) + 3.08

y = 736 + 3.08

y = 739.08

Forward prediction of 100 years produced by the trendline would probably give an invalid value because the trendline only models a range of 9 years prediction. However, a linear regression equation isn't the best for making prediction that far in into the future.

You might be interested in
Solving an Equation for a Given Variable
Reil [10]

Answer:

a=\frac {f-v}{t}

Step-by-step explanation:

f=v+at

It requires you to make a the subject of the formula

f-v=at

Dividing both sides by t then

a=\frac {f-v}{t}

Therefore, the equivalent for a is a=\frac {f-v}{t}

8 0
3 years ago
4.3*(-3.2)*0 positive or negative or zero Help
iragen [17]
I think it's 0 since anything multiplied by 0 is, well, 0! No matter what the sign is. I believe the correct answer is 0 :)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the decimal equivalent of an 11% increase
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

0.11

Step-by-step explanation:

You would convert the percentage to a fraction. Since the % symbol means 'out of 100', you would put 11 over 100: 11/100.

Then you would convert the fraction to a decimal: 0.11.

An easier way could also be to take the percentage and move it two decimal places to the right.

Ex: 43% moved two decimal places to the right would be 0.43.

I hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Is 6/6 more than 3/3
hodyreva [135]
They are both equivalent to 1, so they are equal. 

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP IF YOU NEED ME TO TELL YOU THE INFO FOR A.) I WILL
JulijaS [17]
28.34 can be estimated to the nearest number, which is 28. 26.59 can be estimated to the nearest number, which is 27. 33.11 can be estimated to the nearest number, which is 33. 28+27+33=88
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 3 1/4 x 5 write answer in simplest form please show work
    6·1 answer
  • What is -6r times (12s) simplified?
    15·1 answer
  • A right rectangular prism has a length of 7 centimeters, a width of 5 centimeters, and a height of 4 centimeters. What is the vo
    6·1 answer
  • What is the square root of m6?
    14·1 answer
  • 30 POINTSSSSSSS HALP
    9·1 answer
  • Find the distance between the points. ​(-2​,​2) and ​(-2​,10​)
    12·1 answer
  • In a​ company, 65​% of the workers are women. If 1,015 people work for the company who​ aren't ​women, how many workers are ther
    7·2 answers
  • Jo’s rectangular dining room is 8 feet wide and 3 feet long. Mike wants to install a new wood floor and new base boards. It will
    10·1 answer
  • Which expression is modeled by this arrangement of tiles?
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP IMMEDIATELY!!! 60 POINTS!!! PLEASE RESPOND TO EACH STATEMENT! concerning the graph of an exponential function.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!