1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
3 years ago
7

Tim is investigating the relationship between the number of years since a tree was planted and the height of the tree in feet. H

is data are shown in the table.
Years Since Tree was Planted vs. Height of Tree
Years since tree was planted, x
Height of tree in feet, y
2
17
3
25
5
42
6
47
7
54
9
69

Using a regression calculator, what is a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old?

A calculator screen. A 2-column table with 6 rows titled Data. Column 1 is labeled x with entries 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 17, 25, 42, 47, 54, 69. The regression equation is y almost-equals 7.36 x + 3.08; r almost-equals 0.998.
A good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old is about 315 feet because that is what the trend line, y almost-equals 3.08 x + 7.36, produced by the regression calculator predicts.
A good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old is about 739 feet because that is what the trend line, y almost-equals 7.36 x + 3.08, produced by the regression calculator predicts.
There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the trend line produced by the regression calculator does not give a prediction.
There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.
Mathematics
1 answer:
wolverine [178]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.

Step-by-step explanation:

Years since tree was planted (x) - - - - height (y)

2 - - - - 17

3 - - - - 25

5 - - - 42

6 - - - - 47

7 - - - 54

9 - - - 69

Using a regression calculator :

The height of tree can be modeled by the equation : ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08

With y being the predicted variable; 7.36 being the slope and 3.08 as the intercept.

X is the independent variable which is used in calculating the value of y.

Predicted height when years since tree was planted(x) = 100

ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08

ŷ = 7.36(100) + 3.08

y = 736 + 3.08

y = 739.08

Forward prediction of 100 years produced by the trendline would probably give an invalid value because the trendline only models a range of 9 years prediction. However, a linear regression equation isn't the best for making prediction that far in into the future.

You might be interested in
Does anyone know how to turn these fractions into percents??? please help!!!
belka [17]
You divide the fractions to get percents
4 0
3 years ago
Given y = a(x - h)^2 + k, p = <br> A. a <br> B. 4a <br> C. 1/4a
Flauer [41]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  C.  1/(4a)

Step-by-step explanation:

We assume you're comparing the vertex form ...

  y = a(x -h)^2 +k

to the form used to write the equation in terms of the focal distance p.

  y = 1/(4p)(x -h)^2 +k

That comparison tells you ...

  a = 1/(4p)

  p = 1/(4a) . . . . . . multiply by p/a; matches choice C

__

<em>Additional comment</em>

When using plain text to write a rational expression, parentheses are needed around any denominator that has is more than a single constant or variable. The order of operations requires 1/4a to be interpreted as (1/4)a. The value of p is 1/(4a).

When rational expressions are typeset, the fraction bar serves as a grouping symbol identifying the entire denominator:

  p=\dfrac{1}{4a}

8 0
2 years ago
Marie wants to know the most popular car for parents. She plans to survey the people entering the mall from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00
Andreyy89

Answer:

C. Marie should make sure she surveys both the fathers and mothers.

3 0
2 years ago
Consider this figure of a hexagon.
notsponge [240]
A)
It looks like the [irregular] hexagon has 3 rectangles and 2 triangles within it.
So let's exclude the triangular corners on bottom left and top right for now.
First we have a large rectangle covering most of the upper left of the polygon. 20 ft × 7 ft = 140 sq.ft.
Now we have a rectangle on the bottom right. The width is 11 ft, so take the 7 away from that, 4 ft. × 14 ft. on bottom. 4 ft × 14 ft = 56 sq.ft.
The last small rectangle fits on the right between the 2 other rectangles. It is 24-20 on top/bottom × 7-6 right/left. 4 ft × 1 ft = 4 sq.ft.
Now for the triangles: bottom left is 11-7 × 24-14 = 4 ft × 10 ft. 1/2bh = 1/2×10×4 = 20 sq.ft.
Top right is 24-20 × 11-5 = 4 ft × 6 ft. 1/2bh = 1/2×4×6 = 12 sq.ft.

B)
Add them all together for the total area (A):
A = 140 + 56 + 4 + 20 + 12 = 140+60+32
= 232 sq.ft.

Hope that explains it well enough! ;)
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The sum is 2 One number is twice the other one.​
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

The smaller number is 0.6666... repeating, and the larger number is 1.3333... repeating.

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can some one please help meeee
    6·2 answers
  • What percent of $1.00 are a nickel and a dime?
    7·1 answer
  • Help . Please need done in 15 minutes
    13·1 answer
  • What is the intersection of the given lines? CD←→ and MD←→− point D point M point C DM←→−
    5·2 answers
  • Please help me 10 points
    10·1 answer
  • GINVING BRAINLIST
    7·1 answer
  • Will give brainliest answer
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE OLEASE HELP!!!
    7·1 answer
  • If you pay $0.82 for every $1,000 of earthquake coverage, how much would $15,000 of coverage be?
    10·2 answers
  • Simply the given expressions below.
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!