The Civil War ended with a victory for the North. It used its superior resources to defeat the South. Sherman’s campaign in the South destroyed everything that could have helped the Confederate cause while Grant held Lee at Petersburg until Lee had no choice but to surrender. The war resolved the social issue of slavery. Lincoln had already issued the Proclamation of Emancipation which freed all slaves both in the North as well as the South. It abolished the system of slavery for African Americans who fought for the Union. It also preserved the Union and made America one nation.
C. Americans receive a guaranteed minimum income from the federal government
Slave traders: Thought that slaves werent really people and they could sell and do what ever they wanted with them
Abolitionists: They hated that people would be treated liked slaves and couldnt stand slavery. The knew it was wrong
The were alike because they both took part with slaves.They both took part
They are different because they have different views. One likes slavery one hates it
They helped put an end to it by helping slaves escape, ending it, saving slaves, teaching them how to read and write
Hope This Helps :)
Government spending accounts for a huge amount of the economy — some 40% or so in many modern economies. It’s not a matter of whether the government should try to influence the economy — it inevitably does. The question is in what ways it should try.
Also, it’s impossible to have a modern economy without a central bank and the central bank should be a government agency to keep it responsible to the nation as a whole, so monetary policy is inevitable as well.
2ND ANSWER IF THE 1ST ONE DOESNT WORK
Not even a little. Their motives are not pure and they can never have sufficient information or understanding.
Famous Hayek quote that needs mentioning in this sort of thread:
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. To the naive mind that can conceive of order only as the product of deliberate arrangement, it may seem absurd that in complex conditions order, and adaptation to the unknown, can be achieved more effectively by decentralizing decisions and that a division of authority will actually extend the possibility of overall order. Yet that decentralization actually leads to more information being taken into account.
The Fatal Conceit : The Errors of Socialism (1988), p. 76
I would make an exception for prizes for innovation. They will probably be gamed, but they’ll keep the pols busy and might produce something useful.
It's true bc it can operate any vehicle
