Answer:
d) an explanation of an idea that is broad in scope and supported by a large body of evidence
Explanation:
Answer:
D) The Soviet economy was a tremendous success story; the USSR would still be together if it were not for the ethnic differences.
Explanation:
The Soviet economy was not a tremendous success, in fact, it was in many aspects a failure (although it was a success in some fields).
The other 3, true statements in the question give us a clue why:
The Soviet system benefited the center (Russia) disproportionally, leaving aside the other, peripheral republics in Central Asia, the Caucasus, The Baltics, and Eastern Europe, which were often very poor.
The Soviet system used a planned economy, instead of a market economy, and this led to many errors in the production of goods and services. Resources were often poured in unprofitable industries over more profitable ones, and the geographical location of the economic sectors often did not make sense.
Things that in a market system would likely not happen, ocurred in the soviet planned economy because the planners did not realize their mistakes.
<span>In the summer of 2011 there was an article published in Newsweek magazine that featured Dr. Kirsch who stated that he thought antidepressant drugs were in people's heads and that they were "no more effective than placebos" In Dr. Kirsch's research the drugs mildly outperformed the placebos when it came to treating mild to moderate depression but Dr. Kirsh felt the overall benefits were small. Dr. Kirsch did extensive research reviewing placebo pills on depression versus anti depressants. He even wrote a book on the topic called The Emperor’s New Drugs: Exploding the Antidepressant Myth.</span>
The demand curve only shows the relationship between the price and quantity. If one of the other determinants changes, the entire demand curve shifts. B Shifts the curve
hi he is very busy but when i stop by tomorrow i'll ask him for you that sound good? lol
