Capitalism is a way of thinking that said that as a whole, individual make better and more well-informed decisions than governments. And given a free choice, people will make good decisions on what they buy. These decisions ultimately reward businesses that provide the right products and services while dooming those that provide lousy services and products since these businesses compete against each. So under capitalism, it is individual choice that determines the winners and losers in the market, and on the whole, it's the winners (the good businesses) that stay around in the long term.
Marxism was a way of thinking that basically thought that capitalism ultimately resulted in businesses becoming increasingly larger and oppressive, and they would ultimately concentrate wealth to a fortunate few, who would essentially enslave all others. Ultimately, Marxism believes, that capitalism results in mass exploitation and oppression, and preached that the only way for all people to benefit was by violently overthrowing their capitalistic masters.
Capitalism is a way of thinking that said that as a whole, individual make better and more well-informed decisions than governments. And given a free choice, people will make good decisions on what they buy. These decisions ultimately reward businesses that provide the right products and services while dooming those that provide lousy services and products since these businesses compete against each. So under capitalism, it is individual choice that determines the winners and losers in the market, and on the whole, it's the winners (the good businesses) that stay around in the long term.
Marxism was a way of thinking that basically thought that capitalism ultimately resulted in businesses becoming increasingly larger and oppressive, and they would ultimately concentrate wealth to a fortunate few, who would essentially enslave all others. Ultimately, Marxism believes, that capitalism results in mass exploitation and oppression, and preached that the only way for all people to benefit was by violently overthrowing their capitalistic masters.
Answer:
<h3><em><u>commander-in-chief</u></em></h3>
<em><u>Jefferson </u></em><em><u>Davis</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>(</u></em><em><u>POW)</u></em>
<h3><em><u>General </u></em><em><u>in </u></em><em><u>chief </u></em></h3>
<em><u>Robert</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>E.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Lee</u></em>
Answer:
Vjcjjhkglfkdlfkgvjvhjbkgbpvonl
Ppk8jbikoki7bhjjuuh6bjghku
The development of a two-party system did not result from <em>A. the selection of presidential candidates from "the Virginia Dynasty."</em>
The two-party system, which started with the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, continued to develop until during the controversial presidential election of 1824 between John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson.
The two-party system developed over concerns over the <em>abolition of slavery, voting of virtuous candidates, and the financial crisis of 1819.</em>
Thus, the <em>selection of presidential candidates from "the Virginia Dynasty" </em>did not develop the two-party system in the US.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/22145566
