I think its 5 if right pls give thumbs up and thanks
<em>Answer:</em>
Complete proof is written below.
Facts and explanation about the segments shown in question :
- As BC = EF is a given statement in the question
- AB + BC = AC because the definition of betweenness gives us a clear idea that if a point B is between points A and C, then the length of AB and the length of BC is equal to the length of AC. Also according to Segment addition postulate, AB + BC = AC. For example, if AB = 5 and BC= 7 then AC = AB + BC → AC = 12
- AC > BC because the Parts Theorem (Segments) mentions that if B is a point on AC between A and C, then AC > BC and AC>AB. So, if we observe the question figure, we can realize that point B lies on the segment AC between points A and C.
- AC > EF because BC is equal to EF and if AC>BC, then it must be true that the length of AC must greater than the length segment EF.
Below is the complete proof of the observation given in the question:
<em />
<em>STATEMENT REASON </em>
___________________________________________________
1. BC = EF 1. Given
2. AB + BC = AC 2. Betweenness
3. AC > BC 3. Def. of segment inequality
4. AC > EF 4. Def. of congruent segments
<em />
<em>Keywords: statement, length, reason, proof</em>
<em>
Learn more about proof from brainly.com/question/13005321</em>
<em>
#learnwithBrainly</em>
Answer:
530 in ^2
Step-by-step explanation:
The figure given is a triangle
We use the formula for the area of a triangle
A = 1/2 bh where b is the length of the base and h is the height
The height is perpendicular to the base( at 90 degrees)
A = 1/2 ( 26.5) * ( 40)
= 530 in ^2
Answer: Mr. Lee’s entire face crinkles and lights up when he smiles.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
75
Step-by-step explanation:
1 - P(no tails)
1 - (½)²
1 - ¼
¾ × 100 = 75%
