The correct answer is: "Unexpected, related or possible related to the research, suggests the research puts subjects or others at greater risk"
The OHRP defines an unticipated problem in the scenario of a research involving human participants. Defining the problem as unanticipated means that it was not foreseen at all when detailing the possible risks for the parcipants of the study on when those were asked to sign a consent form. It is also unanticipated in the sense that the problem which have aroused does not match in terms of likelihood with the characteristics of the specific individual suffering it.
Such term does not refer to some inconvenience with minimum consequences, but it suggest that the problem occurring affects the research subjects or others and places them at a greater risk of harm - physical, psychological, economic ,etc.- than was anticipated before the research.
Answer:
It's egoist because it's imposed by an Almighty Power (God in this case), and even if you have the free will, one way or another, it's a condition to be good.
It's consequentialist because every choice you make, based on God's commandments, you will have a consequence, for the good or for the bad.
And finally, it's deontological because you are morally conditioned to choose, you don't have the option to put aside, it's a social convention to choose.
Explanation:
The Divine Command Theory address that everything that happens is based on the power and choice of an Almighty Power and humans are conditioned to choose. Even with the free will, the social and moral conditions demands a choice, that's why it's an egoist, consequentialist and deontological theory.
The estimated cot to America for traffic crashes caused by underage drinkers is more than 10 billion dollars per year.
This cost came from various public property that has to be repaired and the hospitalization by the accident caused by the underage drinkers.
Answer:
Accidental reinforcement
Explanation:
Accidental reinforcement occurs when a reinforcer casually concurs with a positive outcome, so the person associate the outcome with the reinforcer. This type of reinforcement is usually the source of superstitious behaviours.
In this case, Roger associated the fact of wearing green underwear to the good grade he got in his test, the green underwear was the reinforcer that casually concurs with the positive outcome which in this case was the good grade, so Roger started associating both and now he wears green underwear on test days.
