To begin, Brutus’s speech was formal and more directed to the Romans. In his introduction, he starts with “Romans, countrymen, and lovers!” This was used to join everyone together and later help him justify Caesar’s death. Throughout the text, he describes Caesar as an “ambitious” man. Calling Caesar ambitious makes it seem that Caesar only thought about himself. On the other hand, Antony’s speech was more personal and sarcastic. In contrary to Brutus he opens his speech with “Friends, Romans, countrymen…”. This sets up his later statements of being Caesar’s friend. Throughout his speech, he uses paralipsis and repetition to poke at Brutus but at the same time save Caesar’s reputation. Throughout Antony’s speech, he uses devices, tactics, and his sympathy to his advantage. Brutus only had one point, which was that he killed Caesar for Rome, to stand on. All in all, Antony’s speech was better and more persuasive than Brutus's.
<span>a process in which verbal and nonverbal messages shape, reinforce, and change people's responses.
- True persuasion allows the other person to choose or to make a decision based on sound information and ideas.</span>
The early Britons created Stonehenge, a monument probably used as an astronomical calendar. Stonehenge is comprised of roughly 100 massive upright stones placed in a circular layout. It is located in southern England. The eraly britons used primitive tools possibly made from deer antlers to create this monument.
I'm pretty certain the correct answer is a supporting sentence
