<u>Explanation:</u>
First, remember that the difference between <em>normative and positive economic analysis</em> is that;
Normative analysis take a somewhat neutral view by stating how the world should be. While
The Positive analysis states the facts. That is, it describes the world as it is.
<u>
Thus, a </u><u>Normative analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
c. In some cities such as San Francisco and New York, it would be impossible for low−skilled workers to live comfortably in the city without minimum wage laws.
d. The gains to winners of a minimum wage law should be valued more highly than the losses to losers because the latter primarily comprises businesses.
<u>And a </u><u>Positive analysis</u><u> of the consequence of minimum wage would be the following statements:</u>
a. The minimum wage law causes unemployment.
b. A minimum wage law benefits some groups and hurts others.
The correct option is C - Increase assets and increase liabilities
<u>Explanation:</u>
When anorganization purchases office supplies on account then it becomes essential to record such supplies as supplies on hand. Generally, in a business organization, the supllies on hand are used up within the span period of one year which means that they are to be recorded as current asset in the financial statement ( balance sheet). As no cash has been paid to merchandise, so it increases the liabilities also.
Therefore, it will increase the current assets and current liabilities.
Managers can increase cohesiveness in teams through encouraging people to have face-to-face exchanges at work. They should mandate through verbal and non-verbal actions. They should be hands-on in every detail of the company.
Answer:
Decrease by $ 186,000
Explanation:
Variable Mfg. Cost $ 270
Variable Marketing $ 100 + increased by 2 per unid = $ 102
Total Variable $ 372
NOW Sales Price $ 310
Less Total Variable Cost 372
= Contribution Margin $ -62
Times units sold × 3000
= losses $ 186,000
<u>Answer:</u>
The statement that says a code of conduct should be worded in terms of forbidden action rather than acceptable behaviour is false.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judicial acts and laws that prohibit unlawful actions and the code of conduct that provides information about the ideal and acceptable behaviour that are distinct from each other in terms of wording that is used to draft them. A judicial act mentions what is not to be done and a code of conduct mentions what is to be done.
