<u>Answer:</u>Option c
<u>Explanation:</u>
Some of the macro economic event such as interest rates, unemployment, economic growth and inflation affects the stock markets . If any of these events occur then market has its effect on it. EMH is the efficient market hypothesis that the asset prices reflect the market situation.
When the macroeconomic event has not taken place but there is market decline then EMH is not consistent with the event or the macro economic news.Market prices also reflect due to the latest information if any.
Answer:
The answer is personal selling
Explanation:
_Personal Selling_______ is the two-way flow of communication between buyer and a seller that is designed to influence the buyer's purchase decision.
When treasury stock is purchased for an amount greater than its par then the total shareholders' equity decreases.
Given that the treasury stock is purchased for an amount greater than its par.
We are required to find the effect of the purchase of treasury stock for an amount greater than its par on the total shareholders' equity.
Treasury stock is basically known as treasury shares or reacquired stock, and refers to previously outstanding stock that is bought back from stockholders by the issuing company. The result of issuing treasury stock is that the total number of outstanding shares on the open market decreases. Shares of a company are a part of total shareholders' equity and because shares are issued for security, it will decrease the total shareholders;equity.
Hence when treasury stock is purchased for an amount greater than its par then the total shareholders' equity decreases.
Learn more about treasury stock at brainly.com/question/17439058
#SPJ4
Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
