Answer:
read explanation
Explanation:
When gold was discovered on Cherokee land in Georgia, whites poured onto Cherokee lands by the thousands, ignoring treaties, burning villages, and flaunting the U.S. Constitution and the Non-Intercourse laws passed by Congress
Answer: Possession processing
Explanation:
The possession processing is basically refers to the various types of tangible action for the products and the services and different types of other physical possessions that are belongs to the consumers or the users.
According to the given service processes context, Tina is providing the various types of services such as maintaining the gardens, planting and also designing the new garden that comes under the category of possessions processing.
Therefore, Possessions processing is the correct answer.
The unit for resistance is Ohm. When subjected to a potential difference of one volt, the SI unit of electrical resistance transmits a current of one ampere.
<h3>What is resistance?</h3>
It is an electrical circuit, that use to measure the resistance to current flow. The Greek letter omega is used to represent resistance in ohms. Georg Simon Ohm (1784-1854), a German physicist who researched the link between voltage, current, and resistance, is the name given to Ohms.
Thus, option C is correct.
For further detail about resistance refer to this link:
brainly.com/question/20708652
Answer:
We can take for example Josip Broz Tito, a former president of Yugoslavia.
Explanation:
During his time the country went to the period of renewal. People, especially women gained more rights, new laws were introduced. The rate of literacy increased as never before. Reforms were introduced, country prospered. I believe that we can compare him with Charlemagne as although as him he wasn't very educated he realized the need for education, literacy and improvement of life condition as well.
Relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians have been shaped not only by the theologies and beliefs of the three religions, but also, and often more strongly, by the historical circumstances in which they are found. As a result, history has become a foundation for religious understanding. In each historical phase, the definition of who was regarded as Muslim, Jewish, or Christian shifted, sometimes indicating only a religious identification, but more often indicating a particular social, economic, or political group.
While the tendency to place linguistic behaviour, religious identity, and cultural heritage under one, pure definition has existed for a very long time, our modern age with its ideology of nationalism is particularly prone to such a conflation. Ethnic identities have sometimes been conflated with religious identities by both outsiders and insiders, complicating the task of analyzing intergroup and intercommunal relations. For example, Muslims have often been equated with Arabs, effacing the existence of Christian and Jewish Arabs (i.e., members of those religions whose language is Arabic and who participate primarily in Arab culture), ignoring non-Arab Muslims who constitute the majority of Muslims in the world. In some instances, relations between Arabs and Israelis have been understood as Muslim-Jewish relations, ascribing aspects of Arab culture to the religion of Islam and Israeli culture to Judaism. This is similar to what happened during the Crusades, during which Christian Arabs were often charged with being identical to Muslims by the invading Europeans. While the cultures in which Islam predominates do not necessarily make sharp distinctions between the religious and secular aspects of the culture, such distinctions make the task of understanding the nature of relations among Muslims, Jews, and Christians easier, and therefore will be used as an analytic tool in this chapter.