Answer:
A. Multifactor productivity
Original Value of output 2500 un. x $200/un. = $500,000 Value of input 2500 un x $120/un. = $300,000 Multi-factor productivity $500,000/$300,000 = 1.67 Overtime Value of output 4000 un. x $200/un. = $800,000 Value of input 4000 un. x $144/un. = $576,000 Multi-factor productivity $800,000/$576,000 = 1.39 Multi-factor productivity (1.67 – 1.39) / 1.67 = 16.8% decrease
B. LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
Original Value of output 2500 un. x $200/un. = $500,000 Input = (100 people x 40 hr/person) = 4000 hours Labor productivity $500,000/4000 hr = $125/hr Overtime Value of output 4000 un. x $200/un. = $800,000 Input = (100 people x 72 hr/person) = 7200 hours Labor productivity $800,000/7200 hr = $111/hr Labor productivity ($125/hr – $111/hr) / $125/hr = 11.1% decrease
C.GROSS PROFITS
Original $500,000 - $300,000 = $200,000 Overtime $800,000 - $576,000 = $224,000
$24,000 increase
Answer:
1. Annual demand ( D) = 100,000 bags
Ordering cost per order (Co) = $15
Holding cost per item per annum (H) = 15% x $2 = $0.30
EOQ = √<u>2DCo</u>
H
EOQ = √<u>2 x 100,000 x $15</u>
0.30
EOQ = 3,162 units
2. Maximum inventory
= Safety stock + EOQ
= 1,500 + 3,162
= 4,662 units
3. Average inventory
= EOQ/2
= <u>3,162</u>
2
= 1,581 units
4. Number of order
= <u>Annual demand</u>
EOQ
= <u>100,000</u>
3,162
= 32 times
Explanation:
EOQ is the square root of 2 multiplied by annual demand and ordering cost per order divided by holding cost per item per annum.
Maximum inventory is the aggregate of safety stock and EOQ.
Average inventory is economic order quantity divided by 2
Number of order is the ratio of annual demand to economic order quantity.
Answer:
The answer is "No Effect
".
Explanation:
In the situation wherein the write-off would not affect the 2019 net earnings, the write-off reduces that both debt accounts as well as the benefit counter-asset for similar quantities. Whenever an expenditure was recognized, net revenues were affected, therefore, there will be nothing to write off under the allowance approach, so the response is no effect.
The question provides us with the following scenario: "Neil and Zack are working on a project that requires both research and presentation. Neil is better at research, so he gives the presentation to Zack. " A comparative advantage is when an agent is better at something or can produce something at a lower cost. Here, Neil can do research better, so the answer is: A.) Neil doing the research
