Answer:
It strengthened the role of the judicial branch of government.
It affirmed the principle of judicial review.
Explanation:
The famous case of Marbury v. Madison of 1803 resulted from the last-minute appointments- "midnight judges" by outgoing President John Adams mere hours before the succeeding president Thomas Jefferson comes to the office. This appointment resulted in the conflict of what power trumps the other.
President John Adams appointed William Marbury along with several others as justices of the peace hours before he was to step down as President. By the time the next president Jefferson came to office, the commission of Marbury along with some others was still left undelivered. Marbury then took the new Secretary of State John Marshall to court, asking for his commission to be delivered.
This resulted in the court deciding which power decides which fate, confirming the power of judicial review and strengthening the role of the judicial branch. The Supreme Court directed that if any act of Congress is in conflict with the interest of the Constitution, then it can annul any acts it deems unconstitutional.
Thus, the correct answers are the first and third options.
Answer:
Number 1 should be red because it is a cell
Explanation:
I hope that helped you a little
Answer:
The answer is a double-blind study.
Explanation:
A double-blind study is a research method in which neither the participants or the researchers are aware about which group is receiving the treatment. This is done in order to avoid biases such as the placebo effect, as well as preventing accidental cues given by the researchers.
The greatest advantage of this approach is its high validity.
The statements that supports Sue's position that judges should be elected is that Judges are representatives of the people in government just like other officials and should represent majority will.
<h3>How are the Judges choosen?</h3>
In the Judiciary, the justices are often nominated by the President and confirmed by Congress and once in office, the judges can remain in their positions for life.
In practice, the Judges are not elected rather, they are appointed because of the need to make them independent of external forces.
Hence, the statements that supports Sue's position that judges should be elected is that Judges are representatives of the people in government just like other officials and should represent majority will.
Read more about Judges nomination
brainly.com/question/7576271
#SPJ1
Answer:
The best responses for the differences that arose due to political tension during Louisiana's territorial period: Different American systems led to Creole concerns as to whether previous land grants would be honored; and Louisiana’s Creole population disagreed with the American denial of rights for Louisianans of color.
Explanation:
Louisiana was very different from the United States at the time of the territorial period. It had spent many years under French and then Spanish rule, and then back to French again. The result was that the culture in New Orleans was different in terms of language and religion, and in the Spanish system settlers to the region were given land grants. The Creoles were worried that the new American legal system would not recognize the legality of their holdings (Chamberland and Faber, 2014).
The new American territorial legislature also enacted a new slave code in 1806 that denied the few rights that the Louisiana system had given to slaves previously, called the <em>Code Noir</em>. The slaves in Louisiana were no longer permitted to inherit anything or to own property and they could not purchase themselves as a way to gain their freedom. People of color were expected suddenly to treat whites with deference in the 1806 code, something that previously was not codified into Louisiana law. There was also a significant free black population in New Orleans at the time of the Louisiana Purchase that would gradually see their privileges and rights revoked and suppressed once Louisiana became a state (Hanger, 2007).
