Answer:
A. It is likely that she would win on the claim because she does not seek to use the photographs in a business pursuit.
Explanation:
In fair use act, <em><u>which is the copying of any given copyrighted material done for a limited purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize e.t.c,</u></em> the major aim is to prevent the copying of the materilas for financial gains. Such copying can be done without permission from the copyright owner.
She could likely win based on this argument as a result of her trying to copy only few copies of the pictures from the original pictures without any aim of monetizing her copies.
<em>Since it is going to be done for limited purpose, she is within her right of fair use if she decided to go ahead without the photographer's permisssion.</em>
Answer:
To reduce the debt, the country could raise taxes and/or cut spending. These are two of the tools of contractionary fiscal policy, and either tactic could slow economic growth. Spending cuts come with pitfalls thoughExplanation:
<u>The consequences of life tenure for federal judges:</u>
- Life tenure for federal judges was implemented for an extraordinarily vital purpose.
- It protects the judges from the 'political stress' which might come with periodic liability to an 'electorate'.
- But importantly, this ideal does not demand life tenure. Appointment without possibility of renewal for a fixed term of years would fulfill the same purpose.
- But ironically this life tenure has further magnified political divisions.
- So, this has failed to completely implement the judicial independence that the lifetime appointment of a federal judge had hoped to serve.
