1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
S_A_V [24]
3 years ago
8

What was a major difference between Britain's colonies in the South Pacific

History
1 answer:
pogonyaev3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B:The colonies in the South Pacific attracted far more British

immigrants.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Look at the t-chart graphic organizer.
Vsevolod [243]

Answer: to organize ideas for comparing and contrasting two topics

Explanation:

hope this helps                                                                                                                                                              

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drag the major events that led to communism in China in chronological order to arrange them from earliest to most recent.
igomit [66]

Answer:

1.  The Chinese Communist Party and Chinese Nationals worked together as the First United Front.

2.  Chinese Nationalsists purged the Chinese Communist Party from their organization, known as the White Terror.

3. The Chinese Communist Party and Chinese Nationalists worked togerhter to deal with the growing threat of Japan.

4.  The Chinese Communist Party and Chinese Nationalists wage a civil war against each other.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After France defeated England during a battle in the Hundred Years' War, one well-known soldier was captured, tried for heresy,
Scrat [10]

The Answer is Joan of Arc

7 0
3 years ago
The spanish-american war became a turning point in american history because
s2008m [1.1K]
Yes yes yes yes yes yes
4 0
3 years ago
The outcome of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison defined the constitutionality of the
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

B) Judiciary Act of 1789.

Explanation:

John Marshall ruled on this case as the Chief Justice. He first answered that Marbury had a right to his job because it had been signed and approved. The actual delivery was a custom, not a requirement. He then ruled that a writ of mandamus (a type of court order) was the correct way for Marbury to rule. Finally, he noted that the Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed the Supreme Court to make this kind of ruling.

<em>The next question was who could decide this issue. Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court could decide it because the Judiciary Act of 1789 said that they could. However, Marshall said that a section of the Judiciary Act was unconstitutional. That section allowed the Supreme Court to make a writ but the United States Constitution did not. Therefore, that section was unconstitutional and the Supreme Court could not make a writ for Marbury. </em>

Marshall looking over the Constitution and the statute is judicial review, a statement that the Supreme Court had an independent power to determine whether something was constitutional or not.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What political party was Mao Zedong in
    12·1 answer
  • What was the key factor in the development of cities? the origin of large scale warfare that required greater defense of the pop
    6·1 answer
  • Which type of currency was not used in the United States during it's early years
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Churchhill want the U.S. military to get involved?
    11·1 answer
  • One way in which the goals of the Know-Nothing Party in the 1850's and the response to the Red Scare of 1919 were similar is tha
    5·1 answer
  • Briefly describe ONE major difference between Noah’s and Rector’s historical interpretation of the War on Poverty.
    11·1 answer
  • The Puritans were also known as _________ ___________ because although they did not agree with the Anglican Church they did not
    15·1 answer
  • What would likely have happened if Empress Wu had not been a strong leader?
    14·2 answers
  • what is it called when one country extends its authorities over another nation or territory for the purpose of exploiting their
    14·1 answer
  • How many african countries remained independent from europeans control by 1914?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!