I think of a number, multiply it by 3 and add 4 and i get 22
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
We have to put the data for purchased item in a frequency table.
Step-by-step explanation:
The diagram is attached below.
Firstly we have to see that how many customers fall under range .
Then .
Then .
Finally
.
If we go through the items purchased by customers we can see that item ranges from have
customers.
Item purchased range from have
customers.
Item purchased range from have
customers.
Item purchased range from have
customers.
Total number of customers =
As we have total number of customers and they have varied quantity of items purchased.
Answer:
<h2>52 ft.</h2>Step-by-step explanation:
In this case, we need to calculate a perimeter, which is the sum of all sides of the rectangle.
So, rectangles has opposite sides equal, therefore, the perimeter should be:
; having L as the larger side.
Hence, the strip of wallpaper needs to be as least 52 ft.
Answer:
The calculated |t| = |-26.517|=26.517 > 2.326 at 0.01 level of significance
Null hypothesis is rejected at 0.01 level of significance
There is difference between mean savings account balance in 2013 is different from the mean savings account balance in 2012
Step-by-step explanation:
<u><em>Step(i)</em></u>:-
Mean of the Population = 1900
Given random sample size 'n' = 45
Mean of the sample x⁻ = 1000
Standard deviation of the sample = 225
<u><em>Null Hypothesis</em></u>:-
There is no difference between mean savings account balance in 2013 is different from the mean savings account balance in 2012.
<u><em>Alternative Hypothesis</em></u> :-
There is difference between mean savings account balance in 2013 is different from the mean savings account balance in 2012
<u><em>Step(ii</em></u>):-
Test statistic
t = -900 /33.54 = -26.517
|t| = |-26.517|=26.517
Degrees of freedom
γ = n-1 = 45-1 =44
t₍₀.₀₁ , ₄₄₎ = 2.326
The calculated |t| = |-26.517|=26.517 > 2.326 at 0.01 level of significance
Null hypothesis is rejected at 0.01 level of significance
There is difference between mean savings account balance in 2013 is different from the mean savings account balance in 2012