'A corruption scheme in which several bidders conspire to split contracts, thereby ensuring that each gets a certain amount of work, is known as Bid pooling.
Bid pooling coordination is a fraudulent procurement auction method that results in uncompetitive bids and can be conducted by corrupt officials, companies in organized collusion, or between officials and companies. This form of collusion is illegal in most countries. This is a form of pricing and market sharing that often occurs when contracts are determined by tender, such as government construction contracts.
The typical purpose of a bid adjustment is to allow the "winner" to win the order at a non-competitive price. Other parties are compensated in various ways. By cash payment, or by agreement to be named the "winning" bidder in another contract, or to award a portion of the winning bidder's contract to them.
Learn more about Bid pooling brainly.com/question/18725683
#SPJ4
Answer:
Social thinkers who misapplied Darwin's idea believed industrial corporations to be much more superior and hence should not have restricted its actions using laws that provided assistance to the poor people or those that regulate working conditions. These set of people believed that poor people actually made themselves so because they lack the character to be rich, stating that the poor always depended on the government to provide for them rather than practicing personal economics. This resulted to the government spending time to know the difference in poor people who deserves help and those who don't, rather than helping the poor in general.
Explanation:
Social thinkers who misapplied Darwin's idea believed industrial corporations to be much more superior and hence should not have restricted its actions using laws that provided assistance to the poor people or those that regulate working conditions. These set of people believed that poor people actually made themselves so because they lack the character to be rich, stating that the poor always depended on the government to provide for them rather than practicing personal economics. This resulted to the government spending time to know the difference in poor people who deserves help and those who don't, rather than helping the poor in general.
