Charles<span> believed in the divine right of kings and thought </span>he<span> could govern according to his own conscience. ... </span>Charles<span> was </span>tried<span>, </span>convicted, and executed for high treason<span> in January 1649. The monarchy was abolished and a republic called the Commonwealth of </span>England<span> was declared.</span>
Answer:
C. Ziggurat
Explanation:
Hope this helps :) have a great day
While common sense is helpful in explaining certain events, unfortunately, it does not help us: predict the future. Option C is correct. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is common sense?</h3>
Generally, A fundamental capacity to see, comprehend, and evaluate in a way that is shared by the vast majority of individuals is what we mean when we talk about common sense. Common sense is a judgment that is sensible and applicable to daily situations. The intellectual roots of the daily concept of common sense may be traced back to a historical conversation that included many European languages.
In conclusion, While common sense may shed light on a number of occurrences, it can not aid us in the following ways: Speculate about the future
Read more about common sense
brainly.com/question/15182680
#SPJ1
I think the answer is India! I'm sorry if this is wrong.
Explanation:
The five moral principles of Bioethics described by Vaughn are:
- Autonomy,
- Non-maleficence,
- Beneficence,
- Utility and
- Justice.
I believe that this list is complete because all five Vaughn principles are succinct and authentic, and unlike a more abstract approach, such as the normative ethical approach, such as the ethical approach to virtue and deontology, principlism corresponds to a methodology of better understanding and practicality for solving ethical dilemmas in the real world.
The five moral principles are of universal origin and not relative, because they are based on characteristics of a common morality, which is shared by all members of a society, is based on common sense and non-philosophical traditions.
This approach does not conflict with other ethical, theological and social approaches, as this is a consistent, practical approach that can be derived.
