1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tangare [24]
3 years ago
10

Convert 0.72 repeating into a fraction

Mathematics
1 answer:
Fiesta28 [93]3 years ago
5 0

0.72 repeating is the sum of a geometric series with first term 0.72 and common factor 1/100. The sum is given by:

(first term) 0.72 0.72 72

--------------------------- = --------------- = ------------ = ------------

1 - common factor 1 - 1/100 99/100 99

This 72/99 can be reduced to 8/11.

0.72 repeating can be rewritten as the fraction 8/11.


You might be interested in
It is a well-known fact that 50% of the general population are rascals (P(R) = 0.5) and 50% of the general population are not ra
aleksley [76]

Answer:

The answer is D. 0.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Let call R the event that a person is rascal, RC a person is not rascal, TH a person use top hat and NTH a person don’t use top hat.  

From the information on the question we have 4 options with their respective probability:

1. A person could be rascal and use top Hat: this probability is calculate as the multiplication of the probability of be a rascal (0.5) and use a top hat (0.9), then:

P(R y TH)=0.5*0.9=0.45

2. A person could be rascal and don’t use top Hat: this probability is calculate as the multiplication of the probability of be a rascal (0.5) and not use a top hat (0.9), then:

P(R y NTH)=0.5*0.1=0.05

3. A person could be not rascal and use top Hat: this probability is calculate as the multiplication of the probability of not be a rascal (0.5) and use a top hat (0.3), then:

P(RC y TH)=0.5*0.3=0.15

4. A person could be not rascal and not use top Hat: this probability is calculate as the multiplication of the probability of not be a rascal (0.5) and not use a top hat (0.7), then:

P(RC y NTH)=0.5*0.7=0.35

Then the probability that a person is a rascal given that he is wearing a top hat could be written and calculate as:

P(R/TH)=\frac{P(R y TH)}{P(TH)}

For calculate P(TH) we need to sum all the option in which TH is involve so:

P(TH) = P(R y TH)+ P(RC y TH)

P(TH)=0.45+0.15=0.6

Replacing values on the first equation we get:

P(R/TH)=\frac{0.45}{0.6} =0.75

So, the probability that a person is a rascal given that he is wearing a top hat is 0.75

5 0
3 years ago
Find the numerator for the equivalent fraction. 1/4 = x/20
Rama09 [41]

Answer:

The numerator is 5.

Step-by-step explanation:

You would multiply the numerator by 5 as the denominator multiplies by 5.

8 0
3 years ago
License plate in a particular state display 3 letters followed by 3 numbers how many different licenses plates can be for this s
34kurt

Answer:

What state? There is no state there

7 0
3 years ago
The Pew Research Center reported that 73% of Americans who own a cell phone also use text messaging. In a recent local survey, 1
AnnZ [28]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.775 -0.73}{\sqrt{\frac{0.73(1-0.73)}{200}}}=1.433  

Now we can find the p value. Since we have a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z>1.433)=0.152  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.1 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:

Do Not reject H0

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n=200 represent the sample size slected

X=155 represent the cell phone owners used text messaging

\hat p=\frac{155}{200}=0.775 estimated proportion of cell phone owners used text messaging

p_o=0.73 is the value to verify

\alpha=0.1 represent the significance level

We need to conduct a z test for a proportion

z would represent the statistic

p_v represent the p value

System of hypothesis

We want to verify if the true proportion of cell phone owners used text messaging is different from 0.73 so then the system of hypothesis are:

Null hypothesis:p=0.73  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.73  

The statistic to check this hypothesis is given by:

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

Replacing the data given we got:

z=\frac{0.775 -0.73}{\sqrt{\frac{0.73(1-0.73)}{200}}}=1.433  

Now we can find the p value. Since we have a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(z>1.433)=0.152  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level of 0.1 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and the best conclusion for this case would be:

Do Not reject H0

6 0
3 years ago
Find the value of the following expression: (3^8 ⋅ 2^-5 ⋅ 90)−2 ⋅ ⋅ 3^28 (5 points) Write your answer in simplified form. Show a
Darya [45]
18452.8125 use PEMDAS
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Last month we had sixteen days of either green beans or carrots in the cafeteria for lunch. There were six more days of green be
    12·1 answer
  • Juliette is making a fruit salad.she purchased 9 2/3 ounces each of 6 different fruits . how many ounces of fruit did she purcha
    5·1 answer
  • ALGEBRA 1, SEM. 2
    7·1 answer
  • What is an equation equal -x^2-36
    15·1 answer
  • a bag of change 4 nickles,1 quarter,5 dimes,and 15 pennies .what is the probability of choosing a nickel
    11·2 answers
  • Please help! I only need the equations not the graphing​
    9·1 answer
  • If one factor of x2 + 2x - 24 is (x-6)
    9·1 answer
  • Timed Quiz! Please answer the question below for 50 points. It is very easy. 6th-grade math!
    15·2 answers
  • Help please <br> I need this today
    9·1 answer
  • Kelvin ordered four pizzas for a birthday party. The pizzas were cut into eighths. How many slices were there? (Draw a picture t
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!