1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alukav5142 [94]
3 years ago
10

Anti-trust laws ______________________.

Social Studies
2 answers:
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A. prevented businesses from fixing prices and limiting production

Explanation:

Antitrust laws often termed as competition laws, are collection of both federal and state laws or statutes developed by the U.S. government to guide the activities of business orgainzation, most especially, to protect consumers from exploitation from business practices or to enhance, competition for the betterment of the consumers.

The are three main statutes of antitrust laws, they includes the following:

1. The Sherman Act of 1890

2. The Clayton Act of 1914

3. The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914.

These Acts serve three major functions, where the Section 1 of the Sherman Act stops or against the act of price-fixing and the operation of cartels, and not support other collusive practices that unreasonably restrain trade.

Also, Section 7 of the Clayton Act limits the mergers and acquisitions of organizations that most times greatly limits competition.

Lastly, Section 2 of the Sherman Act forbid the abuse of monopoly power.

Hence, it is concluded that Antitrust law prevented businesses from fixing prices and limiting production

zzz [600]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a.  prevented businesses from fixing prices and limiting production

Explanation:

Anti-trust laws refer to laws that were established by the United States government to avoid that companies engage in practices that affect customers and the competition in the market, for example, when several companies establish prices for their benefit and when companies limit their production to maintain certain price. According to this, the answer is that anti-trust laws prevented businesses from fixing prices and limiting production.

The other options are not right because anti-trust laws are about maintaining a free competition in the market and avoid unethical behaviors from the companies which means that these laws don't allow companies to fix prices, limit production or reveal information from clients.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is an accurate comparison of the two court cases?Baker v. Carr (1961) - Shaw v. Reno (1993)A. Ruled that
madreJ [45]

Answer:

(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts

Explanation:

Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.

Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a case of altruism?
Klio2033 [76]
The answer is 2 because altruism is when one is selfless and is concerned for the well-being of others. The prairie dog is giving up an opportunity to help the others by watching for predators.
5 0
4 years ago
Which country first produced Nike?
Yuliya22 [10]
Nike, originally known as Blue Ribbon Sports (BRS), was founded by University of Oregon track athlete Phil Knight and his coach, Bill Bowerman, on January 25, 1964. The company initially operated as a distributor for Japanese shoe maker Onitsuka Tiger, making most sales at track meets out of Knight's automobile.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A situation in which an adolescent does not seem to know or care about his or her identity is called: role confusion. identity a
Fiesta28 [93]
According to Erikson's theory of development, role confusion is when an adolescent does not establish or create their role in society.  Role confusion is when they are unsure of themselves or their place in society.  This can lead to experimentation in different ways of living (lifestyles) and can lead to a feeling of unhappiness. 
<span />
5 0
3 years ago
A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of splinting vs surgery
Lelu [443]
It was splitting not surgery
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Prophecies are found in every type of book in the Bible except the poetic books.
    12·1 answer
  • Kara has behavioral problems as a young child. As she goes through school, she is labeled "troubled," and told she will never am
    12·1 answer
  • In order to support your argument, you need to anticipate the reasons why people might disagree with you. How could you use fact
    15·2 answers
  • Melanie’s Marbles is a young company that buys unusual marbles from many places around the world. To provide assurance for her v
    12·1 answer
  • A eukaryotic gene is most likely to be transcribed if it is located where?
    5·1 answer
  • Drag each label to the correct location on the chart. Match each map with the correct year.
    6·1 answer
  • List two issue in sports that can impede nation building​
    15·1 answer
  • Aware of the controversy surrounding dietary treatments for autism spectrum disorders, Rebecca identifies relevant research and
    12·1 answer
  • 4. Nigeria and its neighbor Cameroon disagree over which country should control the Bakassi region. To pressure Cameroon, the Ni
    10·1 answer
  • The passage below describes an experiment.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!