The term “sense of ownership” is frequently cited as a significant characteristic of community development. While there is increasing use of the terms ownership or sense of ownership, there is a paucity of research regarding what these terms mean, how this body of knowledge influences community development, and the various approaches that can be applied in contemporary community research and practice. A sense of ownership in community development is described as a concept through which to assess whose voice is heard, who has influence over decisions, and who is affected by the process and outcome. Applying the concept of ownership can determine how the strategic interests and actions of individuals or organizations contribute to community development efforts. In addition, the potential for ownership can be understood in part by examining the capacity for and quality of trust. Implications are discussed regarding how the concept of ownership advances the current field, specifically regarding community development research and practice.
An idea that is stated directly in the text
Answer:
1. Biomaterials Developer
2. Manufacturing Engineer
3. Independent Consultant
4. Doctor
5. Biomedical Scientist/Researcher
6. Rehabilitation Engineer
7. Medical Technology Developer
Explanation:
One of the most universal musical forms throughout West Africa is call and response music.
- Call and response refer to the phenomena of a call from someone and then an immediate reply from the listener. In the 'call and response music,' the solo singer raises the song, and then it is continued by the chorus. They also join the song as a response to the soloist.
- Call and response music forms a part of the roots of traditional music in Africa and is just like a congregation of singers in the church.
- In the current period, we can find traces of call and response music in various music forms like salsa, rumba, cha-cha-chá, and timba.
To learn more about music,
brainly.com/question/14430045
brainly.com/question/15109836
#SPJ4
The spread of slavery into the Louisiana Territory was limited.<span>
The US in the beginning was trying to balance the power between the Northern "Free" states (no slaves), and the Southern slave states. However, Missouri soon wanted to join the Union, as a pro-slavery state. This led to arguments on whether Missouri should be admitted or not. The Missouri promise allowed Missouri to join as a slave state into the Union, but, to balance the power, Maine was created to be a free state.
</span><span>The spread of slavery into the Louisiana Territory was limited.
Except for Missouri, all other states created within the Louisiana Territory was to be free states.
hope this helps</span>
