The environment of the New England colonies did not affect the development of slavery in this region. It did not affect the development of slavery because New England soil was not good for farming. Most slaves were used for farming, but since nobody owned a farm in this region, there was little need for slaves, period. Most of the New England region was industries and since the slaves would have to be taught how to do the job, the factory owners pretty much saw no purpose in even using slaves. Don't get me wrong, there may have been some parts of this region that WAS used for farming, but if there were any, it wasn't an abundant amount of them.
I hope this helps you out! Let me know if you need help with anything else! :)
That the person will only act in his/her self interest. The view is a normative form of egoism.
<span>Actually the big urban population shifts are occurring in some parts of the world, where some of the major reasons being like the discrimination of caste, races and languages, and then the local governments implementing some though rules on the other migrated citizens in the form which affects their daily life and needs and mainly their earnings every month after month.</span>
Answer: With the exception of Russia, these countries each have fewer than 5 million immigrants. ... million people, according to United Nations and U.S. Census Bureau estimates. ... Meanwhile, in six European Union countries surveyed, public ... countries are split on whether or not immigrants increase the risk
Explanation:
