A fallacy of reasoning (also called an informal fallacy) is when an argument is not based on on hard data or mathematical formulas, but utilizes some informal logic. We can say that the argument is unsupported. It doesn't prove that the point someone is trying to make is false, but rather it doesn't prove sufficiently that is true.<span>
</span>
The underlined word <em>mansion </em>is used as B. a direct object in this sentence.
What did he construct? A mansion.
The correct answer is D.
We can clearly see that Gilgamesh and Enkidu were triumphant in their battle against Humbaba because Gilgamesh is carrying his head. They killed to monster and chopped his head off in order to show it as proof of their victory. Only in option D do we see the result of their battle, which they won.
Im assuming you have read the book already that its talking about. So what you need to do in the second part is describe how the item affected the character. Like cause and effect. How did the rash effect him? After you do that make sure you say where you got the evidence from. Then the 3rd step explains itself. Write a paragraph on how the items affect their perspective. Hopefully this helps guide you because I dont have the time to read the full book. Just follow those guidelines
