Answer:
Part 1
$1,422,940
Part 2
$331,480
Explanation:
cost of the land calculation
Purchase Price $1305000
Cost to tear down building $121000
Sale of Salvages ($8400)
Leagl fees $5340
Total $1,422,940
The cost of the land that should be recorded by Wilson Co. is: $1,422,940
cost of the building calculation
Architect's fees $47000
Insurance $3900
Liability insurance $4200
Excavation cost $15480
city for pavement $9900
Borrowing Costs $251000
Total $331,480
The cost of the building should be recorded by Wilson Co. is $331,480
Answer:
The answer is: the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Explanation:
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was elaborated in response to several high profile corporate scandals involving multinational corporations. The most infamous scandal involved Enron Corporation and Arthur Andersen LLP (one of the five largest accounting corporations in the world).
The SOX set new requirements for all publicly traded corporations (especially their upper management) an public accounting firms. Only some parts of the SOX apply to private companies.
A job shadow usually lasts one day, but there are cases when they could last several days to give you a more in-depth look at a certain career or company.
Answer:
Explanation:
WORK IN PROCESS INVENTORY
May 1 balance 3770 May 31 Finished Goods 9234
31-May Material 11470
31-May labour 13870
31-May Overheads 9431.6
may 31 Balance 29307.6
JOB COST SHEET
Job no. Beg. WIP Material Labour Overheads Total
430 1340 3850 3400 2312 10902
431 0 4680 8170 5555.6 18405.6
TOTAL 1340 8530 11570 7867.6 29307.6
Note: Total cost of Job 429 transferred to Finished goods:
Beginning cost 2430
Add: Material 2940
Add: Labour 2300
Add: Overheads (2300*68%) 1564
Total cost of Job 429 9234
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
