Answer:
The corrects answers are :
- literacy tests
- language of education
Explanation:
During the 60s until the 70 the Asian Americans had difficulty with living and working conditions and they decided it was the time to demand equal rights and equal access to city services. This brought about a change from the outside and at the same time helping to shape the new social policies.
Answer:
Spanish.
Explanation:
My mother tongue is Spanish and the mantilla, the peineta and the gilet are the traditional dresses wearing in our family.- The mantilla is a traditional Spanish veil piece that is often worn during religious celebrations such as Spanish weddings etc. San Juan also known as Saint John's Day that occur every year on the eve of the 23rd of June, Spain celebrates the arrival of summer and the birth of St John the Baptist.
Answer:
The Napoleonic Code made the authority of men over their families stronger, deprived women of any individual rights, and reduced the rights of illegitimate children. All male citizens were also granted equal rights under the law and the right to religious dissent, but colonial slavery was reintroduced.
Answer:
(D) retrieval cue
Explanation:
Retrieval cue: In psychology, the term "retrieval cue" is described as a prompt that assist an individual to remember different things. When an individual tends to make specific new memories then he or she ought to include a few information related to the given situation as well in which those memories are being developed so that it acts as a trigger to approach the given memories.
Retrieval cues help an individual to approach memories that are being stored in his or her long-term memory and therefore helps to carry-out those memories into his or her "conscious awareness".
In the question above, the picture served as a powerful retrieval cue.
Answer:
Modus Ponens
Explanation:
This way of deduction is a clear example of a Modus Ponens, which is a mechanism used to achieve conclusions and deductions from the given information using an implicit way. In this specific example, it is possible to notice that the in the first part of the given the information, it is only mentioned that Charlotte is in Paris under the Eifel Tower, therefore, it can be concluded that Charlotte is in France, even if it is not directly mentioned in the sentence, due to the fact that it is possible to infer that the city of Paris is located in France.