Critique Olivera's approach on leading the turnaround process because of overconfidence and unrealistic expectation.
<h3>
Critique Olivera's approach on leading the turnaround process?</h3>
Olivera's strategy for managing the turnaround process wasn't very successful. Considering his prior success as an MT, he was overconfident. He had brilliant ideas and was skilled at analyzing the issues that the organization was experiencing inside.
However, he attempted to force such concepts on the four supervisors without first seeking his approval. When he proposed new plans or a change to the way they were functioning, the supervisors resisted because they had considerably more work experience than he did. It is normal to feel in charge when someone new appears out of nowhere and criticizes how things are being done. As a result, the supervisors disapproved of this change strategy.
<h3>
what would you have done differently?</h3>
An organization's goal is frequently to improve when it decides to launch a transformation program. I would have taken a variety of other actions if I were him. I would get to know the staff members better and develop a close personal bond with them during the first few months. Planning a lunch, a supper, or an expedition will help the team bond better. After that, I would visit with each department to discuss any problems they may be having or problems they think are hurting the company's sales.
After that, I would assess whether my observations matched up with the actual issues that employees believed the company was experiencing. Instead of making all the decisions at once, I would solicit the supervisors' opinions on the issues or areas they believe may be improved before providing my own perspective. In order to bring about change, I would advise the supervisor to explore each potential option one at a time without rushing.
Learn more about transformation program: brainly.com/question/10411144
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Federalism is a type of government in which the power is divided between the national government and other governmental units. It contrasts with a unitary government, in which a central authority holds the power, and a confederation, in which states, for example, are clearly dominant.
Federalism in India refers to relations between the Centre and the States of the Union of India. The Constitution of India establishes the structure of the Indian government. ... This federalism is symmetrical in that the devolved powers of the constituent units are envisioned to be the same.
Answer:I, II, III, and IV
Explanation:
It focuses that the Bills will be made into laws by Congress. Of course, the President has a veto, but Congress has the final say. It also touches on taxes a bit.
Answer:
b. Gilmer-Aikin Laws
Explanation:
Gilmer-Aikin law was signed in 1949 by the Texas Legislature with the main objective of reform of the educational sector.
This law helped to increase the state funding and was established by the Texas Education Agency (TEA) which was involved in carrying out the educational program of the state. This validates b. Gilmer-Aikin Laws as the answer.
