All categories

2 years ago

What scale factor was applied to the first rectangle to get the resulting image?

2 answers:

8 0

So, the arrow is telling us that we're going from the small rectangle to the big rectangle.

The 3 and the 7.5 are on the same side of the rectangle, right? So, let's try this backwards.

To get to 3 from 7.5, what do we divide by? (Hint: (7.5)/(3) Divide.)

The scale factor is the answer of the division, which is 2.5. We multiply 3 by 2.5 to get to 7.5.

Dima020 [189]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Wrong its 2.5 kids hope i helped or this is the correct problem your doing.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Ccacacvssvvssjdsvshxb de s zzz dat herh

KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer: gjnyujhgfdrjhg;flhigobkhyjnhkmk,

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

If two lines have the same slope, they are _______.

Sever21 [200]

Answer:

same slope is parallel lines

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

A two-factor between-subjects design is evaluated. The F-value for Factor A has df = 1, 40 and the F-value for Factor B has df =

finlep [7]

Answer:

The df values for the A x B interaction are also 3,40

Step-by-step explanation:

The F-value for Factor A has df = 1, 40

The F-value for Factor B has df = 3, 40.

The df values for the A x B interaction are also 3,40

This is because the source of variation between columns has ( c- 1); rc(n-1) degrees of freedom and the source of variation between rows has (r-1); rc(n-1) degrees of freedom and the source of variation of interaction

(between rows and columns) has ( c-1) ( r-1); rc(n-1) degrees of freedom.

Therefore

Factor A: ( c- 1); rc(n-1) = 1,40

<u>Factor B: (r-1); rc(n-1) = 3,40</u>

Interaction : ( c-1) ( r-1); rc(n-1) = 3*1,(40)= 3,40

where c refers to columns , r refers to rows and n refers to the total sample size.

5 0

2 years ago

Un edificio proyecta una sombra de 7.5m.mientras que un arbol que mide 1.6 m de altura proyecta una sombra 1.85 M¿Cual es la alt

sattari [20]

Answer: The height of the building is 6.49 meters.

Step-by-step explanation:

This can be translated to:

"A building projects a 7.5 m shadow, while a tree with a height of 1.6 m projects a shadow of 1.85 m.

Which is the height of the building?"

We can conclude that the ratio between the projected shadow is and the actual height is constant for both objects, this means that if H is the height of the building, we need to have:

(height of the building)/(shadow of the building) = (height of the tree)/(shadow of the tree)

H/7.5m = 1.6m/1.85m

H = (1.6m/1.85m)*7.5m = 6.49m

The height of the building is 6.49 meters.

5 0

2 years ago

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

3 years ago