Answer:
B
Explanation:
Proximate cause means “legal cause,” or one that the law recognizes as the primary cause of the injury. ... In other words, the plaintiff will have to show that the injuries were the natural and direct consequence of the proximate cause, without which the injuries would not have occurred.
Answer: None of the above
Explanation:
All of the above are correct.
For option A, Economists who advocate discretionary monetary policy do indeed believe that the monetary authority using this policy is more flexible to shape the best monetary policy to the existing circumstances.
Option B is also correct because Crowding out occurs when the government increases investment by borrowing which leaves less money for the private sector to borrow so they spend less. The government spent money here yet the private sector did not spend less so it is Zero Crowing out.
Option C by option B's explanation holds true because the entire amount the Government increased by was denied the private sector.
Option D is also true as not all Economists prefer rule-based monetary policy to discretionary monetary policy.
They are all true.
Answer:
35.92%
Explanation:
The computation of cost of not taking the cash discount is shown below:-
Discount percentage ÷ (100 - Discount percentage) × (360 ÷ (Full Allowed Payment Days - Discount Days))
= 3% ÷ 97% × 360 ÷ (50 - 19)
= 3% ÷ 97% × 360 ÷ 31
= 0.03093 × 11.61290
= 0.359187
= 35.92%
Therefore for computing Mr. Warner's cost of not taking the cash discount we applied the above formula.
Tshbjy uts the hbd cuyjhxbjxb jgdhyeiye. Dkhdudb
Dijduyejbduydudhndbiy idyjnei 35 if
Answer:
hi i reallly tried but dont want to give an answer that is wrong
plz forgive me
god bless u
Explanation:
