1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ohaa [14]
3 years ago
6

Identify the graph of the inverse of the function g(x) shown here.

Mathematics
2 answers:
artcher [175]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: the answer is A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Your welcome fam

nlexa [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

its first top one on the right

Step-by-step explanation:

hope you have a good day :)

You might be interested in
In a circle, what is the ratio of the circumference to its diameter?
NemiM [27]

Answer:

D. pi

Step-by-step explanation:

Circumference of a circle = \pi d

Diameter = d

Therefore, ratio of circumference of a circle to its diameter would be:

\pi d : d

= \frac{\pi d}{d} = \pi => (d cancels d)

Therefore, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter is \pi

4 0
3 years ago
Classify the model as exponential growth or exponential decay. Identify the growth or decay factor AND the percent of increase o
sweet-ann [11.9K]
See also brainly.com/question/8975313

The growth factor is 2.

The increase is (2 -1)*100% = 100% per period.
5 0
3 years ago
What is the answer to this
Gwar [14]
The slope of this line is 0, it would be undefined if the line were vertical
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tracy needs to find the length and width of the equiptment storage room where she works. the room is 2 meters long than it is wi
ElenaW [278]
Rectangle:
P = 2 (L+W) but length is 2 meters longer than wide
then L = W + 2, So
P = 2 (L + W)
24 = 2(W+2+W)
24 = 2 (2 + 2W)
24 = 4 + 4W
So 4W = 24 -4 =20
W = 20/4= 5, L = 5+2= 7

Double check
24 = 2*(5+7) = 2 *12 = 24
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP I WILL PICK BRAINLIEST
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

A more complex question has rarely been asked.

Principia Mathematica took nearly a thousand pages to prove that 1+1=2. It does meander a bit, but had they wanted to prove 1+1=2 alone, it could have done so in 500 pages.

Mathematically speaking, the definition of 1 is:

There exists a number such that when multiplied upon an element of a specified set, yields the element of the specified set.

It is also defined as:

1.0000000000000000000000…

.9999999999999999999999999…

as the set of all singletons.

a singleton is a set with exactly 1 element.

These 4 definitions work in tandem with one another.

For example:

1=1

Divide both sides by 3.

1/3=1/3

Rewrite.

1/3=.33333333333333333...

Multiply both sides by 3.

1=.9999999999999999999...

Similarly:

If    =.9999999999999999999...

10=9.99999999999999999...

10=9+.99999999999999...

10=9+

Simplify by subtracting x from both sides.

9=9

=1

.99999999999999999999...=1

As the set of all singletons, 1 is also THE element that represents the set of all single entities.

That is to say: if you have 7 erasers. What you really have is a set of 7 single entities. The definition of 7 becomes: 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1; and not as is commonly believed as: 6 + 1.

There is an argument for 7 to be defined as 6 + 1, but this argument is a corollary of the Peano Axioms which in turn argues that there exists a set with absolutely nothing in it {} and a set with exactly something in it {x}. More on this later.

The Principia Mathematica uses Peano's (from the Peano Axioms mentioned earlier) work and notation to expertly slice through the many nuances pertaining to this question.

This is something we will not do; but hopefully, we will also be able to effectively demonstrate why 1 + 1 = 2 in less than 1000 pages.

We will assume these basic principles of number theory:

There exists a number such that when multiplied to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

There exists a number such that when added to an element of a specific set, yields that element of the specific set.

If we again assume to have only two sets, a set that is empty: {} containing no elements, and a set that is not empty {x} containing an element. We realize that Consequently, we went from nothing {}, to something {x}. This means that {x} is the successor to {}, as the next step up from nothing, is something.

As such we now have two elements:

Nothing, {}, and something that comes after {}, this something is called the successor, and it is the Successor of nothing.

in written notation we have:

{} and { the Successor of nothing }

Rewritten:

{0, the thing that comes after 0}

Further reworded:

{0, Successor (0) }

Reduced further:

0,(0)

Where S(0) stands in place of ‘the successor’. Further, we know there are an infinite number of possible Natural numbers, and we get:

{0, Successor of 0, the successor of the successor of 0, the successor of the successor of the successor of 0,…}

Further reduced:

0,(0),((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

Further explained:

We know that we had nothing, and added something to it, and got something:

Nothing + Something = Successor of nothing.

0+__=(0)

We also know that there is nothing closer to 0, than the thing that comes after 0.

0+(0)=(0)

This implies that S(0) is the smallest increment possible from natural number to next natural number.

As a consequence, we now have two discovered entities: Something, and Nothing.

Let’s give them names.

We have decided that

Nothing = 0 .

0 = Nothing.

S(0) is the something that comes after nothing.

We define a new symbol: 1, to be: 1 = S(0)

This is to say that 1 IS the symbol that succeeds 0;

We could have drawn any shape to define the number that succeeds 0; we chose to draw a 1.

0+(0)=(0)

0+1=(0)

0+1=1

0,1,((0)),(((0))),((((0)))),(((((0)))),…

We now have definitions for 0, and 1. What about a definition for the thing that comes after one? The successor of 1?

As we know S(0) is the smallest increment available, and we are interested in finding S(0)’s successor we investigate:

The successor to the successor of Nothing:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)

This reads:

The successor of the successor of nothing IS the successor of one

And now… we need a new symbol.

We define the

(1)=2

The successor of 1 IS 2.

Thus:

0+(0)=1;1+(0)=(1)=2

Simplify:

0+1=1;1+1=(1);(1)=2.

Further:

0+1=1;1+1=2;2=2.

1 has many different properties; but all of the properties and their resulting definitions have little to do with why 1 + 1 = 2. And that 1 + 1 = 2 is a byproduct of properties inherent to Natural numbers.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lim x>0- ((x+deltaX)^2+x+deltaX-(x^2+x))/deltaX
    5·1 answer
  • If b is the midpoint of ac and ac = 8x-20, find bc
    10·1 answer
  • What is the answer to 56/-8?
    7·1 answer
  • Simplify (-8q^3r^4s^2)^2
    11·1 answer
  • I am making 50 cupcakes i need to measure flour which unit of measure would I use to measure the flour
    11·2 answers
  • Karen rode her bike at a constant speed of 10 miles per hour. Her distance d is proportional to the number of hours she rode, t.
    10·1 answer
  • what is the greatest common factor of two numbers is 4. The sum of the numbers is 76. What are the two numbers?
    14·1 answer
  • It cost Evan $17.70 to send 177 text messages how many text messages did he send if he spent $19.10
    5·1 answer
  • (50 points) What is the value of x in the triangle?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the gradient of the graph shown?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!