Answer:
The answer is "choice a"
Explanation:
In the given question the missing choices is added in attached file please find it.
The additional output produced through hiring an extra item of such an input reflects the marginal product (MP). For the very first time. for example, its marginal labor productivity was increased output generated by recruiting additional work.
This law diminishing marginal returns as more as units that even the marginal result of even an input, that is hired input.
In other words, any additional work input would generate less than a previous employee because recruiting additional workers decreases expected revenue on jobs, the laid-off of employees, which means the Labor would grow expected revenue.
In Japan is laying off fewer employees even despite the slowdown it continues to produce strong outputs. The lower-priced revenues and their work remain constant along with their steady overall performance.
Your medium product (total) item divided by total work would stay intact. United states staff layover to the other side. It laid-off the staff equals higher marginal labor for overall returns it's going to be higher production besides that, lower labor in the United States could mean an increase in the gross labor output but a larger for Japan, more then, that's why the choice a is correct.
Answer: Opportunity
Explanation:
Carrie's unethical decision making is triggered by the fact that she has just been given the opportunity to become the salesperson for her company. In some cases people's behavior to ethics could be negatively influenced, if they had the opportunity to occupy some key offices.
Answer:
The earnings will increase by $20,000
Explanation:
This is because none of the five classification criteria is met, this is an operating lease. Accordingly, Lakeside will record lease revenue for each of the four $30,000 payments, increasing its earningsby $120,000 each year. In addition Lakeside, as owner of the asset, will record depreciation. Assuming straight-line depreciation of the $2.5 million cost over the 25-year life, that’s $100,000depreciation expense each year. So, earnings are increased by a net $20,000 ($120,000 − $100,000).
Answer:
it's depends on your current location.....
Explanation:
and I don't know about your location... sorry...
hope it's help you.....
Answer:
62.42%
Explanation:
The following are national income account data for a hypothetical economy in billions of dollars:
government purchases ($1130),
personal consumption expenditures ($4800),
imports ($370),
exports ($240),
and gross private domestic investment ($1150).
Personal consumption expenditures expressed as a percentage will be derived by dividing the amount of the expense by the total figure; and multiplying by 100:
[4800 / (1130 + 4800 + 370 + 240 + 1150)] x 100 = 62.42%