<span>It should be laid out like this example:(November 10, 2015)</span>
Answer:
The answer is "choice a"
Explanation:
In the given question the missing choices is added in attached file please find it.
The additional output produced through hiring an extra item of such an input reflects the marginal product (MP). For the very first time. for example, its marginal labor productivity was increased output generated by recruiting additional work.
This law diminishing marginal returns as more as units that even the marginal result of even an input, that is hired input.
In other words, any additional work input would generate less than a previous employee because recruiting additional workers decreases expected revenue on jobs, the laid-off of employees, which means the Labor would grow expected revenue.
In Japan is laying off fewer employees even despite the slowdown it continues to produce strong outputs. The lower-priced revenues and their work remain constant along with their steady overall performance.
Your medium product (total) item divided by total work would stay intact. United states staff layover to the other side. It laid-off the staff equals higher marginal labor for overall returns it's going to be higher production besides that, lower labor in the United States could mean an increase in the gross labor output but a larger for Japan, more then, that's why the choice a is correct.
N each of the different generic business models, customer feedback and marketing are very different because the products and consumers are different. This core difference requires synergistic strategies across all levels in order to properly support the corporate level with the information it needs.
Hope it helps!:)
Answer:
Diseconomies of Scale
Explanation:
On the contrary to economies of scale which save costs when production levels go up, diseconomies of scale make costs go higher when their is an increase in the size of the organization.
Livi's Love From Scratch cupcake bakery has increased in size to reach 10 locations and this has caused crowed areas and delays.
Answer: <em><u>Developers can spend $55316.9</u></em>
Explanation:
EAR =![[e^{Annual percentage rate} -1]\times 100](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Be%5E%7BAnnual%20percentage%20rate%7D%20-1%5D%5Ctimes%20100)
Effective Annual Rate=
Effective Annual Rate% = 9.42
![PV_{Ordinary Annuity} = C\times [\frac{(1-(1+\frac{i}{100} )^{-n} )}{(i/100)} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV_%7BOrdinary%20Annuity%7D%20%3D%20C%5Ctimes%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281-%281%2B%5Cfrac%7Bi%7D%7B100%7D%20%29%5E%7B-n%7D%20%29%7D%7B%28i%2F100%29%7D%20%5D)
where;
C = Cash flow per period
i = interest rate
n = number of payments
![PV = 3500\times [\frac{(1-(1+\frac{9.42}{400} )^{-5\times 4} )}{(9.42/400)} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV%20%3D%203500%5Ctimes%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281-%281%2B%5Cfrac%7B9.42%7D%7B400%7D%20%29%5E%7B-5%5Ctimes%204%7D%20%29%7D%7B%289.42%2F400%29%7D%20%5D)
PV = $55316.9