1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Verdich [7]
4 years ago
14

Explain how to find 40×50 using mental math

Mathematics
2 answers:
lara [203]4 years ago
5 0
Just do 4x5 then add the zeros
umka21 [38]4 years ago
3 0
Think about 40 over 50 and a line separating the answer from the problem like this:

                 40
              x 50
              ---------
                200         0*0=0 5*4= 20 so just put the zero back on the answer and you get 200.

the answer goes under the dotted line
You might be interested in
Thank you so much, my friend
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This is quite a doozy, my friend. We will set up a d = rt table, fill it in...and pray.

The table will look like this before we even fill anything in:

            d        =        r        *        t

SUV

sedan

Ok now we start to pick apart the problem. Motion problems are the hardest of all story problems ever. This is because there are about 100 ways a motion problem can be presented. So far what we KNOW for an indisputable fact is that the distance from Georgetown to Greenville is 120 km. So we fill that in, making the table:

             d      =      r      *      t

SUV     120

sedan  120

The next part is derived from the sentence "After an hour, the SUV was 24 km ahead of the sedan." This tells us the rate of the SUV in terms of the sedan. If the SUV is 24 km ahead of the sedan in 1 hour, that tells us that the rate of the sedan is r and the rate of the SUV is r + 24 km/hr. BUT we have other times in this problem, one of them being 25 minutes. We have a problem here because the times either have to be in hours or minutes, but not both. So we will change that rate to km/min. Doing that:

24 \frac{km}{hr} × \frac{1hr}{60min}=.4\frac{km}{min} So now we can fill in the rates in the table:

            d      =      r      *      t

SUV    120    =   r + .4

sedan 120    =     r

They left at the same time, so now the table looks like this:

             d      =      r      *      t

SUV    120     =   r + .4  *      t

sedan  120    =      r      *      t

We will put in the time difference of 25 minutes in just a sec.

If d = rt, then the equation for each row is as follows:

SUV:   120 = (r + .4)t

sedan:   120 = rt

Since the times are the same (because they left at the same time, we will set the equations each equal to t. The distances are the same, too, I know that, but if we set the distances equal to each other and then solve the equations for a variable, the distances cancel each other out, leaving us with nowhere to go. Trust me, I tried that first! Didn't work.

Solving the first equation for time:

sedan:  \frac{120}{r}=t  That's the easy one. Now the SUV. This is where that time difference of 25 minutes comes in from the last sentence. Let's think about what that sentence means in terms of the times of each of these vehicles. If the sedan arrived 25 minutes after the SUV, then the sedan was driving 25 minutes longer; conversely, if the sedan arrived 25 minutes after the SUV, then the SUV was driving 25 minutes less than the sedan. The latter explanation is the one I used in the equation. Again, if the SUV was driving 25 minutes less than the sedan, and the equations are solved for time, then the equation for the SUV in terms of time is

\frac{120}{r+.4}=t-25 and we solve that for t:

\frac{120}{r+.4}+25=t

Again, going off the fact that times they both leave are the same, we set the equations equal to one another and solve for r:

\frac{120}{r+.4}+25=\frac{120}{r}

I began by first multiplying everything through by (r + .4) to get rid of it in the denominator. Doing that:

[r+.4](\frac{120}{r+.4}) +[r+.4](25)=[r+.4](\frac{120}{r}) which simplifies very nicely to

120+25(r+.4)=\frac{120}{r}(r+.4)  So maybe it's not so nice. Let's keep going:

120+25r+10=\frac{120r}{r}+\frac{48}{r} and keep going some more:

130+25r=120+\frac{48}{r} and now we multiply everything through by r to get rid of THAT denominator:

r(130)+r(25r)=r(120)+r(\frac{48}{r}) giving us:

130r+25r^2=120r+48 Now we have a second degree polynomial we have to solve by factoring. Get everything on one side and factor using the quadratic formula.

25r^2+10r-48=0

That factors to

r = 1.2 and r = -1.6 and both of those rates are in km/minute. First of all, we cannot have a negative rate (this is not physics where we are dealing with velocity which CAN be negative) so we throw out the -1.6 and convert the rate of 1.2 km/minute back to km/hr:

1.2\frac{km}{min} × \frac{60min}{1hr} and we get

r = 72 km/h, choice B.

Wow...what a pain THAT was, right?!

5 0
3 years ago
What is the area of the shaded triangle inside the square? Round your answer to the nearest square inch.
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
Area of the triangle = 1/2 * base * <span>height 

base = 16 in
</span>height  = 16 in

Area = 1/2 * 16 * 16 = 128 in.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4/5 minus 1/3 plz i need help
IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

7/15

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1

We can't subtract two fractions with different denominators. So you need to get a common denominator. To do this, you'll multiply the denominators times each other... but the numerators have to change, too. They get multiplied by the other term's denominator.

So we multiply 4 by 3, and get 12.

Then we multiply 1 by 5, and get 5.

Next we give both terms new denominators -- 5 × 3 = 15.

So now our fractions look like this:

12

15

−  

5

15

Step 2

Since our denominators match, we can subtract the numerators.

12 − 5 = 7

So the answer is:

7

15

Step 3

Last of all, we need to simplify the fraction, if possible. Can it be reduced to a simpler fraction?

To find out, we try dividing it by 2...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 3...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 5...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 7...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 11...

No good. 11 is larger than 7. So we're done reducing.

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME. IM STUCK IN A SUMMER SCHOOL AND IF I DONT GET GOOD GRADES ILL GET IN BIG TROUBLE AND IM TOTALLY LO
Mrrafil [7]

Answer:

We know that in the box there are:

4 twix

3 kit-kat

Then the total number of candy in the box is:

4 +3 = 7

a)

Here we want to find the probability that we draw two twix.

All the candy has the same probability of being drawn from the box.

So, the probability of getting a twix in the first drawn, is equal to the quotient between the number of twix and the total number of candy in the box, this is:

p = 4/7

Now for the second draw, we do the same, but because we have already drawn one twix before, now the number of twix in the box is 3, and the total number of candy in the box is 6.

this time the probability is:

q = 3/6 = 1/2

The joint probability is the product of the individual probabilities, so here we have

P = p*q = (4/7)*(1/2) =  2/7

b) same reasoning than in the previous case:

For the first bar, the probability is:

p = 3/7

for the second bar, the probability is:

q = 2/6 = 1/3

The joint probability is:

P = p*q = (3/7)*(1/3) = 1/7

c) Suppose that first we draw a twix.

The probability we already know that is:

p = 4/7

Now we want another type, so we need to draw a kit-kat, the probability will be equal to the quotient between the remaining kit-kat bars (3) and the total number of candy in the box (6)

q = 3/6

The joint probability is:

P = p*q = (4/7)*(3/6) = 2/7

But, we also have the case where we first draw a kit-kat and after a twix, so we have a permutation of two, then the probability in this case is:

Probability = 2*P = 2*2/7 = 4/7

3 0
3 years ago
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n%20%7B%20%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20%2B%206n%20%2B%205" id="TexFormula1" title="n { }^{2} + 6n + 5"
Anastasy [175]

Answer: (n+5)x(n+1)

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Write 6n as a sum

2. Factor out n form the expression

3. Factor out n+5 from the expression

(n+5)x(n+1)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Justin is pouring a concrete walkway around his grandmother's rectangular garden. He wants the walkway to be 3 feet wide all the
    11·1 answer
  • Write an algebraic expression of the verbal expression the quotien of five times x and fifteen
    13·1 answer
  • I'll give BRAINIEST<br><br> .............
    12·1 answer
  • Estimate then record the product 293*4
    14·1 answer
  • Solve <br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%20%20%7Bx%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20-%205" id="TexFormula1" title="y = {x}^{2} - 5
    5·1 answer
  • What is another way to write 3 x (4 +7)?
    5·1 answer
  • Are -77x +11y = 77 and y-7x+7=0 parellel
    14·1 answer
  • Kevin is taking a taxi from the airport to his home. There is a $6 fee for riding in the taxi. In
    15·2 answers
  • Amy cut 32 feet of chain into pieces that were each ¼ ft long. How many of these pieces did Amy have after cutting the chain? Re
    13·1 answer
  • Irene can snap 48 times in 8 minutes at a constant rate. How many
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!