Answer:
Let us pick the case of the organization known as Starbucks. Presently we will give 3 models according to which we feel that it doesn't comprehend the brain science of holding up in their procedure where they could deal with the client's view of standing by better utilizing the guideline from the Norman and Maister's articles. While holding up at a Starbucks behind a tremendous line, we can have numerous cases :
a) Uncertain Waits Are Longer than Explained Waits - There is no clarification or sureness with respect to how a lot of time it will take for the espresso or your refreshment to be conveyed while you are in that line. This is questionable as the client's before you would request mass requests which may take additional time than only one espresso. In this way, these holds up are questionable.
b) Occupied Time Feels Shorter than Unoccupied Time - While you are remaining in that line, you have an inclination that your 5-10 minutes have been squandered which you could have better used busy working or at home. In this manner, the time was abandoned and hence feels a waste. While on the off chance that the time was involved by some different methods in the line, at that point it would have been justified, despite all the trouble to remain in the line.
c) Individual Waits Feel Longer than Group - Now very likely in a line, we will have people who are standing by solo for their request in the line. In this manner, the performance hold up will feel longer than holding up in an organization of companions or additionally little converses with outsiders or conveying here and there. In this manner, the issue of solo holding up is a distress and it remains.
Answer:
flexible time
Explanation:
Since their work time is not fixed, these employees have flexible work time. Often, this kind of working time is deemed to be a non-financial work benefit, as most people prefer to define their own work time. Sometimes, it is debated if this is really beneficial for the employees.
Nonetheless, they do have to respect their daily work time slot,
Answer:
b. a radio broadcast
Explanation:
The pure public good is a good which is non-rivalrous and non-excludable. Non-rivalrous represents that the goods does not diminshed in the case when more people consumed it while on the other hand, the non-excludable represents that the goods are available to all
Therefore as per the given options, the option b is correct
hence, the other options are incorrect
Answer:
Permanent partial disability
<h3>
What is permanent partial Disability?</h3>
- Permanent Partial Disability — a worker's compensation disability level in which the injured employee is still able to work but not with the skill and efficiency demonstrated prior to the injury.
- As a result, the earning capability of the worker is affected.
To learn about Permanent partial disability, refer
to brainly.com/question/25689052
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. "Would you consider these mixers to be inventory or should they be classified as supplies or equipment?" Why?
The mixers will be part of merchandise inventory since Mei-ling is purchasing them and will later resell them at a higher price and hopefully make a profit. Products classified as supplies or equipment are used by the company in their day to day activities and are not meant for resale.
2. "I’ve learned a little about keeping track of inventory using both the perpetual and the periodic systems of accounting for inventory. Which system do you think is better? Which one would you recommend for the type of inventory that I want to sell?"
The perpetual inventory system is much better than the periodic inventory system, but it is also more expensive to use. Depending on the number of mixers that are going to be sold, you can do it hand or use a computer software which would make things much easier, but you need to spend time (labor) and money to do so.
If Mei-ling is expecting to sell only a small number of mixers, then she could use a periodic inventory system which is much more simple and is only updated every certain period of time (monthly, quarterly, semiannually or annually). This is a cheaper system but it is the best alternative.
3. "How often do I need to count inventory if I maintain it using the perpetual system? Do I need to count inventory at all?"
Even if you use the perpetual inventory system, you will eventually need to physically count your inventory in order to make sure that the records have been properly made, but you could do it once or twice a year. Again it depends on the total units that she expects to have in inventory.
