Answer:
10
Step-by-step explanation:
Turn 3 1/3 into an improper fraction.
(3*3) + 1 = 10/3 so 10/3 is the same as 3 1/3
Turn the 3 into an improper fraction of 3/1
Now multiply 10/3 * 3/1 multiplying straight across: 10*3/3*1=30/3=10
Answer:
impossible
Step-by-step explanation:
X + X + 1 + X + 2 = 56. To solve for X, you first add the integers together and the X variables together. Then you subtract 3 from each side, followed by dividing by 3 on each side. ...
3X + 3 = 56. 3X + 3 - 3 = 56 - 3.
3X = 53. 3X/3 = 53/3.
X = 17 2/3. Since 17 2/3 is not an integer, there is no true answer to this problem.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a = 9 meters
Step-by-step explanation:
The perimeter is the sum of the side lengths:
28 m = a + 2m + a + 8m
18 m = 2a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . subtract 10m, collect terms
9 m = a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . divide by 2
The value of a is 9 meters.
Answer:
Type I: 1.9%, Type II: 1.6%
Step-by-step explanation:
given null hypothesis
H0=the individual has not taken steroids.
type 1 error-falsely rejecting the null hypothesis
⇒ actually the null hypothesis is true⇒the individual has not taken steroids.
but we rejected it ⇒our prediction is the individual has taken steroids.
typr II error- not rejecting null hypothesis when it has to be rejected
⇒actually null hypothesis is false ⇒the individual has taken steroids.
but we didnt reject⇒the individual has not taken steroids.
let us denote
the individual has taken steroids by 1
the individual has not taken steroids.by 0
predicted
1 0
actual 1 98.4% 1.6%
0 1.9% 98.1%
so for type 1 error
actual-0
predicted-1
therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 1.9%=0.019
so for type II error
actual-1
predicted-0
therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 1.6%=0.016
