Overall, technology is not the end-all be-all of sustainability, but it is a tool that can be used to effectively create larger amounts of communication and collaboration, and clearer sets of information.
All of the given practices can be effective in minimizing group harms.
Answer: Option E
Explanation:
As mentioned in the options, a collaborative review of the ongoing research by the Institutional Review Board can be taken from time to time during the course of the research to check whether the group of human samples is facing any adverse effects of the research or not.
A chalked plan promising the disclosure of the results of the research can also help in decreasing group harm. Moreover, consultation among the parties participated in research can also reduce the risk of group harm.
Answer:
A scandal involving an illegal break-in at the Democratic National Committee offices in 1972 by members of President Nixon's reelection campaign staff. Before Congress could vote to impeach Nixon for his participation in covering up the break-in, Nixon resigned from the presidency., The falling of Nixon; When people on Nixon's campaign broke into the Watergate Hotel and stole dirt on the Democrats. Although Nixon was not responsible he covered it up and got the blame., Nixon's Impeachment.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Answer:
In classic research, Dweck (1975) found that boys tend to attribute their poor performance in math to unstable internal factors, whereas girls tend to attribute their poor performance in math to stable internal factors.
Explanation:
Here, we are talking about motives related to attribution. Notice that Dweck found that boys attribute their success in math to unstable internal factors, and girls to stable internal factors.
External and internal are related to the locus of the attribution, the "location" of the cause of success or failure. For instance, an external attribution may be the fact that the test was easy. An internal one may be our own ability in math.
Unstable and stable are related to the stability of the attribution. For instance, cramming for the exam is an unstable attribution, since the effort we put into studying may vary each time. Ability, on the other hand, is a stable one, since it lasts and has consistency.
