What if the Supreme Court didn't have the power to interpret the constitution?

2 answers:

8 0

If the Supreme Court didn't have that ability, then they couldn't keep a check on Congress or the President as much as they do now which would make them the weakest of the 3 branches.

gizmo_the_mogwai [7]3 years ago

3 0

The Supreme Court has the power to enact the constitution, formed by the constituents of the Senate. Truly, constitutions are established and tested by the members of Senate and President and they have the power to choose the magistrate for the Supreme Court. The principal purpose of the Supreme Court is to implement these constitutes in the society to maintain its security. When a law or policy is formed by these members, the judges of the Supreme Court observe its validity within the structure of constitutions and notify when found any irrelevancy or their laws violate the laws of constitutions. It also has the authority to inform the President when he is going to violet the rules of the state. If the Supreme Court has limited power for the analysis in the constitutions, some policies might be assembled by the Senate which is against the laws of forming constituents and right of the people.

You might be interested in

Jennah's friend's father has just passed away. She does not just say she is sorry for the loss, but rather she tells her friend

NeX [460]

Answer:

The given situation is an example of : <u>Empathy</u>

Explanation:

Empathy, an emotional state, can be described as the ability of an individual to understand the emotional or the mental state of another individual.

It can also be described as the ability of an individual to feel and express the emotions of the other person, from their frame of reference. It involves caring and having a desire for helping the person.

Therefore, the given situation is an example of <u>Empathy.</u>

7 0

4 years ago

Trinitas is enrolled in an introductory psychology class. Her instructor told the class that everyone had to participate in his

irinina [24]

Answer: Students have the right to refuse to participate in this study.

Explanation: From this scenario, the most appropriate statement is that students have the right to refuse to participate in the study. This is because the research project is a personal project by the instructor, which is not a prerequisite for passing the course introductory Psychology. Simply because the instructor made it a part of the course, the students have the right to refuse participation.

6 0

3 years ago

Hello, for anyone who wants to say anything that is difficult that they are going through in life I will gladly listen and help

pshichka [43]

Answer:

my mf teacher made us write an essay ( 2 btw) in 1 frickin hour are you kidding me?!

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Esperanza was predicted and expected to do poorly in a math class. At the end of the semester, Esperanza got an F in math. This

lbvjy [14]

Based on the fact that Esperanza was predicted and expected to do poorly in a math class. At the <em>end of the semester</em>, Esperanza got an F in math. This is an example of

A self fulfilling prophecy

<h3>What is a Prediction?</h3>

This refers to future forecasts which are done by a person concerning a particular event and the projections which are expected.

With this in mind, we can see that Esperanza was predicted to fail and do very poorly at maths and at the end of the semester, her expectations came to pass and this is an example of self fulfilling prophecy.