Answer:
B. Cost-plus pricing.
Explanation:
This is explained to be a cost based pattern or unique strategy which is seen to ensure that costs are been covered in the sense that all pricing variables are seen to add some particular percentage to mark its price. It is seen in most cases is obviously seen to cover all cost of what exactly it is a customer is seen to have loved or valued in the said product.
Certain scenarios has shown that optimization is rare in the discussed topic' way to calculate a price, it shouldn't be your only way of finding price.
Not Guarantee of accuracy: Accounting recorded all the financial transactions with the past value. ...
Real Value of items: The financial account does not show the real value of assets. ...
Accounting Ignores Qualitative Element: It recorded all the financial transaction which are in the monetary form.
Answer:
The answer is: Quantitative easing
Explanation:
Quantitative easing is a type of monetary policy in which the central bank purchases predetermined quantity or amount of government securities or other financial assets to increase the supply of money, encourage lending and investment and inject liquidity into the economy. It is a unconventional monetary policy which is used when the standard expansionary monetary policy is ineffective and during low or negative inflation.
<u>Therefore, the given policy is known as </u><u>Quantitative easing.</u>
The apt size of a hammer that can be used a s a jigsaw would be
16oz.
Explanation:
To see the size of hammer that would be necessary we must understand the size of the outlet box and how it would require the jig to be.
The average height of an outlet box is usually 12 inches from the floor and it is then attached to a secondary box above it which is 16 inches
So, to lift this piece by the jig we can see that the standard sized hammer of 16 ounces would be apt and would do the job completely well.
So this is the one that must be used.
Jan. 1, 2013:
Initial investment = (100 shares)*($30/share) = $3,000.
End of 2013:
Dividend collected = ($2/share)*(100 shares) = $200
End of 2014:
Dividend collected = ($3/share)*(100 shares) = $300
End of 2015:
Dividend collected = ($4/share)*(100 shares) = $400
Returns::
From sales of 100 shares = ($33/share)*(100 shares) = $3,300
From dividends = 200 + 300 + 400 = $900
Total returns = 3,300 + 900 = $4,200
Realized returns = Total returns - Initial inestment
= 4200 - 3000
= $1,200
Answer: $1,200
