Answer: 1. The European colonization of North America had a devastating effect on the Native population. Within a shot period of time their way of life changed forever.
2. The epidemic disease was a leading factor of the population decline of the American indigenous people after 1492, there were other contributing factors, all of them were related to European contact and colonization. One of these factors was wardare.
Explanation: im not sure tho, so sorry if its wrong, if its right cam you mark me brilliant please...
Answer:
Probably Narcissus because he was vain about something(his looks) that he didn't actually have control over, whereas Arachne was vain/proud but at least she has the skills to back it up and Niobe was just proud of her ability to have kids.
Explanation:
In his seminal book on the historical periods of Western attitudes
toward death, Philippe Aries describes four consecutive periods through
which these attitudes evolved and transformed. According to him, the
historical attitudes of Western cultures have passed through four major
parts described above: “Tamed Death,” One’s Own Death,” “Thy Death,” and
“Forbidden Death.” This paper, after exploring this concept through the
lens of Persian Poetic Wisdom, concludes that he historical attitudes
of Persian-speaking people toward death have generally passed through
two major periods. The first period is an amalgamation of Aries’ “Tamed
Death” and “One’s Own Death” periods, and the second period is an
amalgamation of Aries’ “Thy Death” and “Forbidden Death” periods.
hope that helped :)
The first dropping of the Atomic bomb on Hiroshima killed 90,000 to 146,000 people. Half of the people died on the first day of the Hiroshima bomb and over the next 2 to 4 months the other half of the people died.
The second dropping of the bomb on Nagasaki killed 39,000 to 80,000 people. The deaths happened the same way it did for Hiroshima.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice "Innocent people should not be denied guns just because criminals use them illegally."
Under this "individual right theory<span>," the United States Constitution restricts legislative bodies from prohibiting firearm possession, or at the very least, the Amendment renders prohibitory and restrictive regulation presumptively unconstitutional.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
