1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bagirrra123 [75]
3 years ago
7

Vince wrote the sequence below.

Mathematics
2 answers:
fgiga [73]3 years ago
7 0
Let's rewrite the given sequence :1/3, 1, 5/3, 7/3 . Notice that 1 =3/3, then

1/3, 3/3, 5/3, 7/3,...We also notice that the common difference d is equal to:
3/3 - 1/3 = 2/3 and 5/3 - 3/3 = 2/3 & 7/3 - 5/3 = 2/3

Hence this sequence is NOT A GEOMETRIC PROGRESSION but               an ARITHMETIC PROGRESSION,instead with d = 2/3

Oduvanchick [21]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct statement is:

<em>The sequence is not geometric because 2/3 was added to each term to get the next term.</em>

Step-by-step explanation:

Vince wrote the sequence below.

1/3, 1, 5/3, 7/3...

the sequence could also be written as:

1/3,3/3,5/3,7/3,.....

Let a_n represents the nth term of the sequence.

now the first term of the sequence is:

a_1=\dfrac{1}{3}

second term is:

a_2=\dfrac{3}{3}

which could also be obtained as:

a_2=a_1+\dfrac{2}{3}

Third term is:

a_3=\dfrac{5}{3}

which could also be obtained as:

a_3=a_2+\dfrac{2}{3}

Fourth term is:

a_4=\dfrac{7}{3}

which could also be obtained as:

a_4=a_3+\dfrac{2}{3}

The correct reason that explains that the given sequence is geometric or not  is:

The sequence is not geometric because 2/3 was added to each term to get the next term.

(Hence such a sequence is not geometric but an arithmetic sequence with common difference of 2/3)

You might be interested in
The vector (a) is a multiple of the vector (2i +3j) and (b) is a multiple of (2i+5j) The sum (a+b) is a multiple of the vector (
kow [346]

Answer:

\|a\| = 5\sqrt{13}.

\|b\| = 3\sqrt{29}.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let m,n, and k be scalars such that:

\displaystyle a = m\, (2\, \vec{i} + 3\, \vec{j}) = m\, \begin{bmatrix}2 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}.

\displaystyle b = n\, (2\, \vec{i} + 5\, \vec{j}) = n\, \begin{bmatrix}2 \\ 5\end{bmatrix}.

\displaystyle (a + b) = k\, (8\, \vec{i} + 15\, \vec{j}) = k\, \begin{bmatrix}8 \\ 15\end{bmatrix}.

The question states that \| a + b \| = 34. In other words:

k\, \sqrt{8^{2} + 15^{2}} = 34.

k^{2} \, (8^{2} + 15^{2}) = 34^{2}.

289\, k^{2} = 34^{2}.

Make use of the fact that 289 = 17^{2} whereas 34 = 2 \times 17.

\begin{aligned}17^{2}\, k^{2} &= 34^{2}\\ &= (2 \times 17)^{2} \\ &= 2^{2} \times 17^{2} \end{aligned}.

k^{2} = 2^{2}.

The question also states that the scalar multiple here is positive. Hence, k = 2.

Therefore:

\begin{aligned} (a + b) &= k\, (8\, \vec{i} + 15\, \vec{j}) \\ &= 2\, (8\, \vec{i} + 15\, \vec{j}) \\ &= 16\, \vec{i} + 30\, \vec{j}\\ &= \begin{bmatrix}16 \\ 30 \end{bmatrix}\end{aligned}.

(a + b) could also be expressed in terms of m and n:

\begin{aligned} a + b &= m\, (2\, \vec{i} + 3\, \vec{j}) + n\, (2\, \vec{i} + 5\, \vec{j}) \\ &= (2\, m + 2\, n) \, \vec{i} + (3\, m + 5\, n) \, \vec{j} \end{aligned}.

\begin{aligned} a + b &= m\, \begin{bmatrix}2\\ 3 \end{bmatrix} + n\, \begin{bmatrix} 2\\ 5 \end{bmatrix} \\ &= \begin{bmatrix}2\, m + 2\, n \\ 3\, m + 5\, n\end{bmatrix}\end{aligned}.

Equate the two expressions and solve for m and n:

\begin{cases}2\, m + 2\, n = 16 \\ 3\, m + 5\, n = 30\end{cases}.

\begin{cases}m = 5 \\ n = 3\end{cases}.

Hence:

\begin{aligned} \| a \| &= \| m\, (2\, \vec{i} + 3\, \vec{j})\| \\ &= m\, \| (2\, \vec{i} + 3\, \vec{j}) \| \\ &= 5\, \sqrt{2^{2} + 3^{2}} = 5 \sqrt{13}\end{aligned}.

\begin{aligned} \| b \| &= \| n\, (2\, \vec{i} + 5\, \vec{j})\| \\ &= n\, \| (2\, \vec{i} + 5\, \vec{j}) \| \\ &= 3\, \sqrt{2^{2} + 5^{2}} = 3 \sqrt{29}\end{aligned}.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the sum of the 9th square number and the 3rd cube number?
Lesechka [4]
The sum of the 9th square number and 3rd cube number is 108
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One foot is equivalent to approximately 0.3048 meters. if a building is 65-feet long, what is the length of the building in mete
adelina 88 [10]
If one foot is equivalent to 0.3048 meters, then <span>0.3048 x 65 feet should give us our answer.

</span>0.3048 x 65 feet = 19.812.

19.812 rounded to the nearest tenth is 19.8.
5 0
3 years ago
Evaluate a-b for a=5 and b=(-8)
Rudik [331]

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

a = 5

b = -8

5 - -8 = 13

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which number line shows the solutions to n &gt; 3?ヽ(°◇° )ノ
balu736 [363]
It is the first number line :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Mr.Rice needs To replace the 166.25 feet of edging on the flower bed in his backyard. The edging is sold in lengths of 19 feet.
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASEE HELP!!
    6·1 answer
  • Please help 11 points ASAP
    6·2 answers
  • What is the function rule represented by the following table?
    12·1 answer
  • If 2&lt;=&lt;14, which two lines are parallel ?
    11·1 answer
  • mr. grover stayed on q hotel for two days. the room rent was ₹3,500 per day. he also had to pay a luxury tax of 7% on the room r
    10·1 answer
  • What is the volume of the prism?
    11·1 answer
  • 6 1/3 - 4 1/9 <br> I need help again
    8·2 answers
  • What is the least common multiple of 7 and 10?
    11·1 answer
  • Helpppp plisss!!!!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!