Answer:
if it isn't compound interest, i think it is $3029.9447
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-2 > -6 . . . or . . . R > S
Step-by-step explanation:
If you plot the temperatures of the two cities on a number line, you see that the temperature for City R is plotted to the right of the temperature for City S. This means the temperature of City S is less than that of City R.
If your inequality relates cities:
S < R or R > S
If your inequality relates temperatures:
-6 < -2 or -2 > -6
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The first step in solving the equation is to cube both sides:
(∛x)³ = (-4)³ . . . . . = (-4)(-4)(-4) = 16(-4) = -64
x = -64 . . . . . simplified
__
We're not sure what "checking" is supposed to involve here. Usually, one would check the answer by seeing if a true statement is made when the answer is put into the original equation.
∛(-64) = -4 . . . true
Many calculators will not compute √(-64) because they compute roots using logarithms. The log of a negative number is not defined.
So, the way one would check this is to cube both sides, which is how we got the answer in the first place. We expect the same result from doing the same operation again, so it isn't really a check.
Answer:
No, it's not a solution.
Step-by-step explanation:
-2 + 4(3) = 4
-2 + 12 = 10
-2 + 3(3) = 1
-2 + 9 = 7
PV = P(1 - (1 + r)^-n) / r; where P is the periodic withdrawal = $100,000; r = rate = 5% = 0.05; n = number of periods = 20 years.
PV = 100000(1 - (1 + 0.05)^-20) / 0.05 = 100000(1 - 1.05^-20) / 0.05 = 100000(1 - 0.3769) / 0.05 = 100000(0.6231) / 0.05 = 100000(12.4622) = 1,246,221 ≈ $1,250,000