Answer:
The correct answer is a) The kinetic energy of the ice increases by equal amounts for equal distances.
Explanation:
The law of conservation states that the energy cannot be created nor be destroyed but can be converted from one form to another.Before the ice even starts falling we already know that it possesses energy in the form of potential energy given by P=mgh where m is the mass of the ice , g is the acceleration due to gravity and h is the height of the ice above the ground whatever that may be, since a number is not given here.As the ice falls the energy is converted from potential energy to kinetic energy. We notice one thing about the equation for the potential energy P , which is that it is not only directly proportional to h but also is linear in h as well(which is the main reason why a) is correct) which means that if the ice drops by 1 meter the potential energy it will have lost would be ΔPE=mgΔh=-mg, where Δh is the change in its height which is 1 meter here.And according to the principle of conservation of energy this energy must be converted to kinetic energy so the ΔKE=-ΔPE=mg, and this process repeats and for each meter it falls, it picks up the same amount of kinetic energy equaling mg(which is the same as the loss in PE per each meter of fall). So a 2 meter decrease in height will result in an increase in KE of 2mg, a 3 meter decrease in height will result in an increase in KE of 3mg. gain in kinetic energy only depends on the drop in height, which is true irrespective of where the ice might happen to be in its journey close to the top or the bottom. So the drop in height of lets say x at any point in the journey will result in the same increase in KE = ΔKE = mgx. Which proves part a) to be correct.
The radial velocity method preferentially detects large planets close to the central star
- what is the Radial velocity:
The radial velocity technique is able to detect planets around low-mass stars, such as M-type (red dwarf) stars.
This is due to the fact that low mass stars are more affected by the gravitational tug of planets.
When a planet orbits around a star, the star wobbles a little.
From this, we can determine the mass of the planet and its distance from the star.
hence we can say that,
option D is correct.
The radial velocity method preferentially detects large planets close to the central star
Learn more about radial velocity here:
<u>brainly.com/question/13117597</u>
#SPJ4
Answer:
mass is lifted 1.8 m. What is the potential energy of the mass 4. A 100 kg
Answer:
Definitely Spinning permanent magnets within an array of fixed permanent magnets
Explanation:
Any relative motion between magnets (be they permanent or electromagnetic) and a coil of wire will induce an electric current in the coil.
What will not induce an electric current is the relative motion between the two coils of wire (because there is no change in magnetic field), or the relative motion between two magnets (there are no coils of wire to induce the current into).
<em>Therefore, spinning permanent magnets within an array of fixed permanent magnets does not induce an electric current.</em>
