I believe the answer is: <span>claims about human behavior need to be supported with evidence
In scientific field, an evidence is important so other experts in similar field could review them and bring us closer to the truth.
But compared to other science fileds, Data from psychological research is much more likely to be in qualitative form rather than quantitative.</span>
It is the supreme court’s responsibility to monitor government infringement on civil rights according to the doctrine of Judicial review.
If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
The answer is "Pam does have a claim for sexual harassment because she is being harassed because she is a woman."
We can define sexual harassment as unwelcome sexual gestures, demands for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical lead of a sexual sort when either:
The conduct is made as a term or state of a person's business, training, living condition or support in a University people group.
The acknowledgment or refusal of such direct is utilized as the premise or a factor in choices influencing a person's business, training, living condition, or support in a University people group.
The direct irrationally impacts a person's work or scholarly execution or makes a scary, threatening or hostile condition for that person's business, instruction, living condition, or support in a University people group.
Menstruation im pretty sure or maybe puberty but probs the first one
