Here, we are decide the best option between making the part or buying the part.
a. Make or Buy Analysis
Particulars Make amount Buy amount
Direct Materials $4.50
Direct Labor $1.00
Overhead (80% of Direct Labor) $0.80
Cost to buy <u> </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost per unit <u>$5.70 </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost Difference = $5.70 - $4.70
Cost Difference = $1.00
Therefore, the cost difference of making amount over buying amount is $1.00.
b. Because of the difference, Beto should buy the part because its cost is lesser than to make the part.
Therefore, the buying of the part is the best decision.
See similar solution about Analysis
<em>brainly.com/question/23287319</em>
Answer:
13%
Explanation:
As per the situation the solution of required rate of return first we need to find out the beta which is shown below:-
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
11% = 7% + Beta × 6%
Beta = 1
now If the market risk premium increased to 6% so,
The required rate of return = 7% + 1 × 6%
= 13%
Therefore for computing the required rate of return we simply applied the above formula.
In a world that is synchronized on a global scale, trade between nations is constant. Imports cannot be reduced by 20% in order to close the trade deficit.
<h3>Why it is not possible to reduce imports?</h3>
There are certain nations that will be impacted if the United States decides to cut imports by 20%.
As a result, imports from the United States will likewise be restricted in other nations.
In other words, the United States may experience a fall in exports while attempting to reduce imports. The overall impact on trade imbalances could be minimal.
The trade conflict between the United States and China is a good illustration. China responded to the United States taxes on its imports by imposing its own levies. As a result, both countries suffered.
As a result, there is no quick fix for decreasing trade deficits. A more delicate balance between consumption and production must be achieved over time.
The manufacturing industries must have favorable policies and incentives to encourage consumer demand for locally made items.
Check out the link below to learn more about trade deficit;
brainly.com/question/28708620
#SPJ2
The proportion of the optimal risky portfolio that should be invested in stock A is 0%.
Using this formula
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=[(Wa-RFR )×SDB²]-[(Wb-RFR)×SDA×SDB×CC] ÷ [(Wa-RFR )×SDB²+(Wb-RFR)SDA²]- [(Wa-RFR +Wb-RFR )×SDA×SDB×CC]
Where:
Stock A Expected Return (Wa) =16%
Stock A Standard Deviation (SDA)= 18.0%
Stock B Expected Return (Wb)= 12%
Stock B Standard Deviation(SDB) = 3%
Correlation Coefficient for Stock A and B (CC) = 0.50
Risk Free rate of return(RFR) = 10%
Let plug in the formula
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=[(.16-.10)×.03²]-[(.12-.10)×.18×.03×0.50]÷ [(.16-.10 )×.03²+(.12-.10)×.18²]- [(.16-.10 +.12-.10 )×.18×.03×0.50]
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=(0.000054-0.000054)÷(0.000702-0.000216)
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=0÷0.000486×100%
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=0%
Inconclusion the proportion of the optimal risky portfolio that should be invested in stock A is 0%.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/21273560
Calculation of Commission earned:
We are given that Joan sells new cars at a local dealership and she receives a 15% commission on profit.
So we can say that :
Commission earned = 15% * Total profit
Last week she sold 9 cars for the total of $10,870 dealer profit
Hence Commission earned shall be calculated as follows:
Commission earned = 15% * Total profit
Commission earned = 15% * 10870 = $1,630.50
Hence, the Commission earned by Joan is <u>$1,630.50</u>
