Answer: E) The company expects a constant weighted average cost of capital.
Explanation: The explicit forecast period in most organisations are usually made between five to about fifteen years,this is to ensure that enough timeline is given to effectively capture all the necessary information to do proper forecast.
The only option that is not a desirable feature of the steady state is that. The company expects a constant weighted average cost of capital. All other options are desirable feature because they have positive impact on the business and will make a good forcast.
Answer:
B) proportional
Explanation:
In the case of the proportional tax structure the marginal tax rate should be equivalent to the average tax rate without considering the high level of taxable income or low level of taxable income
Therefore in the given case, the tax structure should be proportional
hence, the correct option is B
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
$844,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Accounts Receivable = $900,000
Credit balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts per books before adjustment = $50,000
Expected amount of uncollectible = $56,000
Bad debt expense at the end of the period is determined by subtracting the credit balance of allowance for doubtful accounts from the expected amount of uncollectible.
Bad debt expense:
= Expected amount of uncollectible - Credit balance
= $56,000 - $50,000
= $6,000
At the end of the period, the allowance for doubtful accounts has a balance of $56,000 that are to be uncollectible.
The cash realizable value of the accounts receivable at December 31, after adjustment, is determined by simply subtracting the Allowance for doubtful accounts from the accounts receivable. It is calculated as follows:
= Accounts Receivable - Allowance for doubtful accounts
= $900,000 - $56,000
= $844,000
The answer is B. You subtract the profit and income and you should get 33,345.
Answer:
Jenny pays Abe $300 to give the dog to his parents who live on an isolated farm
Explanation:
The answer is already stated within the question, but I'll provide the explanation.
In order to reach a solution, Jenny would have to offer Abe an amount to get rid of the dog that is more than Abe's benefit of owning the dog, which is $200.
On the other hand, since Jenny bears a cost of $400 from the bark, she would only be willing to spend as much as $400 to resolve the situation. Therefore, the acceptable range for the amount of the agreement for both parts is:
$200 < X < $400.
Since $300 is within that range. Jenny paying Abe $300 to give the dog to his parents is a possible solution.
