I would argue that the character of the young Daisy Miller was an innocent flirt rather than a manipulator. She was full of life, of freedom, of sincerity, and of grace, and she was beautiful, carefree, charming, and certainly ahead of her time, but she was far from being a manipulator. She had "a great deal of gentlemen's society," as she herself pointed out, but she was unpretentious, "unsophisticated," and "completely uncultivated," as Winterbourne described her, so it is possible to say that she acted naturally, not in a manipulative way.
This can also be confirmed in the passage that narrates the moment when they both met: "... (Daisy) was a coquette; he was sure she had a spirit of her own; but in her bright, sweet, superficial little visage there was no mockery, no irony." This, once again, indicates that she was honest and straightforward, and far from Machiavellian.
It’s a bad example because a lot of negative things can turn into positive things depending on wish we look at it and yes life isn’t fair sometimes but sometimes life is incredible beautiful and so magical that it’s worth some parts of life that aren’t fair
Answer:From two years later to sailing
Explanation:
As you can see racism happened on the boats. He was getting so much insults that he decided to leave making him unhappy. No one gets happy when they get discriminated
Hope that helps :D
Answer:
Explanation:
When you have a stormmm it alyways comes before a rainbowww
I want to feel whole, I wanna feel free
I dont want to be a plain screen whennnnn
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!!!!! lolllll
Words like <em>never, always, everybody, </em>etc. are absolute nouns and adverbs. In argument, these are usually a sign of over-generalization. These words alone cannot be considered as any kind of appeal (emotional, logical or ethical) since these appeals are done depending on how you use these words, not on the meaning of words as stand-alone.
