Leadership is not needed when:
- It will make processes inefficient due to time wasting
- It is being used to oppress people
- Subordinates don't need leadership
Leadership is usually quite good as it can galvanize subordinates to be better workers due to better organization as well as inspiration.
There are instances where it is not needed however such as when:
- It slows down processes - sometimes leaders will need to give permission for a subordinate to do something. If this thing is time conscious and the leader is not available to give their ascent, the whole process could suffer.
- It oppresses people - when a leader is an oppressive one and acts in such a way that their subordinates suffer, that leadership is not needed.
- Subordinates are fine without it - sometimes workers have the necessary skills and experience to operate independently without a leader. In such a case, a leader is not needed.
In conclusion, while a leader is quite important in many ways, there can be situations where it is best that they are not used.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/24150490.</em>
Answer:
a pic and send it to you and your name
Answer:
Efficiency of the system = Actual output/ Effective capacity*100
Efficiency of the system = 850/950*100
Efficiency of the system = 0.894737*100
Efficiency of the system = 89.47%
Utilization of the system = Actual output/Design capacity*100
Utilization of the system = 850/1200*100
Utilization of the system = 0.708333*100
Utilization of the system = 70.83%
Answer:
A: is a key aspect of the activity - based costing model
Explanation:
Hopefully this helps!
