Answer and Explanation:
There is no copyright infringement here. Savant homes had not taken a copyright protection for the design prior to this time. Also in the case it was found that the design is not in fact a unique design by Savant homes as it is used widely and was common before savant homes used it. And so it was a dummy model for everyone to copy from. Therefore the infringement was considered invalid as there was no ground for savant homes to claim it as am intellectual property
Answer:
Explanation:
Effect of crowding out:
The crowding out phenomena describes the economic phenomena in which an increase in government public spending leads to reduced or perhaps may eliminate of private investment.
Multiplier:
The multiplier represents the ratio of income to investment change.
Given that:
$13 billion increase in government spending will lead to a $52 billion
The rise in demand for goods & service will be the value of multiplier which is
= 52/13
= 4
To determine the multiplier using the formula:
Multiplier = 1 /( 1- MPC)
4 = 1/(1 - MPC)
4 (1 - MPC) = 1
(1- MPC) = 1/4
-MPC = 0.25 - 1
MPC = 0.75
Marginal propensity to consume = 0.75
Answer: Yes contract has been formed.
Explanation: According to the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (UETA), electronic transactions are just as binding as transactions made on hardcopy documents. Moreover signatures made electronically reinforces the validity of these elctronic documents.
In the scenario the actual signature was signed on a hard copy by the seller, but it was then faxed back to the listing agent. This faxed copy, showing the faxed signature, is an electronic document that confirms the existence of the contract in accordance with the UETA. This faxed signature is as enforceable as an ink signature.
The beginning period retained earnings, net profit/net loss made during the accounting period, and cash and stock dividends paid during the accounting period. (i may be wrong because there was no picture but i this is right)
